nah, there is a boxer 133W, dual 18650 released a while ago. Not many examples of the dual though!Looks like Hcigar will be the first (that I know of) to release a dual battery DNA mod. Could not find any specs as of yet, but looks interesting. I'm fine with a 133 watt limit if it means I can run it on dual 18650s.
View attachment 515205
I find the VT40 and VT200 to be exceptionally attractive. I can't say the same for this VT133 or VT25 though. I like the idea of dual 18650. 133W is more than what I need. But I can't get over how ugly this looks. Now if HCigar can come up with a single 18650 DNA running 70-80W...
133w because two 18650s can't handle 200w safely.HCigar VT133 (DNA200) | Boxy, E-pipe | E-papierosy-forum.pl - największe w Europie forum
I really hope this is not the finished product... It look really cheap...
Also, can some one explain me the math as to why it goes to 133w with 2 batteries? I forgot it... sorry!
133w because two 18650s can't handle 200w safely.
Sent from my M7_PLUS using Tapatalk
The DNA200 is limited to a 23amp draw (25 amp fuse). So when your batteries are getting low, say 3.0V each (will be lower with 18650's once you attach the load because of voltage sag).Yeah, I get that it can't handle 200w safely, that's pretty obvious. Was just wondering about facts with math involved![]()
The DNA200 is limited to a 23amp draw (25 amp fuse). So when your batteries are getting low, say 3.0V (will be lower once you attach the load because of voltage sag).
Watts = Voltage X Amps (current).
6v x 23a = 138 watts.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Steve
finally.... now, to get evolve to make a DNA75-DNA80 with escribe for the single batt crowd! but kudos to hcigar, i'm in![]()