They are in parallel not series.
It's odd how they have the springs setup in the pic if they are in parallel... usually that's how they configure series.
They are in parallel not series.
Is there any chance you guys have any of these with the transformer logo sitting around still? Used or unused? Id be willing to purchase either way...
Is there any chance you guys have any of these with the transformer logo sitting around still? Used or unused? Id be willing to purchase either way...
They are in parallel not series.
Use only flat top bats in these, button top are way to tight.
Tap'n on my S5
I read that the chip is US made, evolve is the only US chip maker I know of.
Tap'n on my S5
Well, partly based on manufacturer stating that it is a parallel circuit, secondly based on the microcontroller used in the device which has a very low voltage supply requirement. Also based on 39yrs as a Technician and Engineer in microcircuits. To provide a regulated 5v 2.1a output for the PowerBank the batts would have to be in parallel to provide the necessary current supply. If you have two batts in series your voltage doubles but your current is equivalent to the output of one batt so if you use 3.7v 2000mah batts you would have 7.4v at 2000mah to work with, regulating that down is more difficult and your current supply would be limited to 2000mah and would not last long enough to charge anything. where as in Parallel you would have 3.7v 4000mah, easier to regulate up and plenty of current to charge most devices. On the battery layout, holders like what is in there are easier found then the others and are most commonly used.How did you determine this? The consensus in the official thread from all the owners is that they run in series. If they were parallel, wouldn't the batteries go in in the same direction?
I read that the chip is US made, evolve is the only US chip maker I know of.
Tap'n on my S5
Well, partly based on manufacturer stating that it is a parallel circuit,