HORRIBLE "reporting / investigation" by NBC Affiliate In NEW MEXICO

Status
Not open for further replies.
[h=1]4 For Your Side investigation reveals dangers of e-cigs[/h][h=2]KOB Albuquerque, NM
Nov. 27, 2013. 12:13 AM EST[/h]

www.clipsyndicate
.com/video/playlist/1805/4748115?title=broadcast_local_2

This is not "reporting" nor an "investigation". It's so bad .......... and the doctor is a 'tool'.

Tom
 
Last edited by a moderator:
KOB NEWS will not listen - but I feel better.

After viewing several of your “investigative reports” on e-cigarettes it is evident that very limited research was put forth before ‘airing’ any segments. While it is possible for high school age individuals to purchase e-cigarettes I know of no manufacturer or retailer who markets their product targeting young people.

How about doing a "investigative report” on NICOTINE GUM, PATCHES and the FDA APPROVED DRUG "CHANTIX"?? Children certainly can ingest any of the three just as easily as they might the "e-liquids" you portray as being potentially deadly.

NOTE: Nicotine poisoning

Nicotine poisoning results from too much nicotine; acute nicotine poisoning usually occurs in young children who accidentally chew on nicotine gum or patches.

While you show 'photos' from a web site and note all the tempting colors and flavors and how they may be attractive to ‘children’ - have you actually SEEN these products when delivered to the consumer? Virtually none come "packaged as described". They are no more attractive to children than a bottle of liquor or drain cleaner with the same label. Certainly the “possibility” exists that a child might ingest the contents; however, a prudent parent taking measures to reduce the opportunity would virtually eliminate any risk.

Perhaps deeper investigation – especially within additional members ofthe medical community would reveal e-cigarettes can be and in fact are an effective ‘tool’ used by individuals to stop smoking? Reporting one side, citing one doctor and one event surely cannot be considered “investigating”; your reports are in fact one-sided, biased and without a doubt not fully informative.

Perhaps you might consider taking a moment to read the following letters; you may have reason to at least reconsider your ‘report’ and the many inaccuracies contained therein?

Scientific errors in the Tobacco Products Directive concerning e-cigarette

Misleading statements in the press about nicotine poisonings from e-cigarettes

An astonishing statement made by public health scientists: young adults (smokers) should be deterred from trying e-cigarettes (and therefore maintain their smoking habit?

I conclude with a quote from one of the above:

“The tobacco control movement believes that the best way to “educate” the community is by lying, providing fear-mongering and intimidating claims and distorting science. Deterring someone from trying e-cigarettes is similar to encouraging him to continue smoking, and this is really unfortunate. We are seeing this strategy every day, through their statements to the news-media.”
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread