First off, my ideas about the metals used in the switch came from
WikiAnswers - Why are circuit breakers and contacts coated with silver - this should explain what type of metal to at least Coat the parts with. Having worked with a lot of different coatings in the machine world, most of the time they're priced in weight or size... A huge box of these little contact parts would probably not be *that* expensive. The coating itself should be commonly used for this exact purpose on tiny parts like these and should IMHO (i have even looked around and found applications at multiple plating and coating shops around the united states) be readily available. turn around time would be a week or two, depending on shipping methods.
The "tact" switches were a type of mechanical switch i guess you could say before. They're "duty cycle" was up in the millions if i can remember correctly. But, you'd have to take one apart yourself to see how they worked. I'm not going to go in depth on it. My own tact switch from my protege failed the day after i bought my protege, and apparently a lot of other peoples did as well. i was able to take the entire thing apart, put it back together, and then re-solder it all back together. This switch actually still works in my protege.
In the V2 (and "mechanical" switch in general), PS was making an attempt to get away from soldering all together... it's really time consuming and hard to keep quality control under well... control. Which was actually the problem with my own tact switch.
The advantage of PS making their own mechanical switch is they can tweak the design themselves to make it work right, instead of trying countless switches out there in the world as well. I personally have made my own PV with other ideas i had with parts from Radioshack and can say i wasn't really impressed with any of the 3 different switches i bought. Also, these switches HAVE to be soldered. Replacing everything with something that is solder-less takes this out of the equation. Not to mention implementing a normal resistor or regulator takes up a lot of space and needs to be soldered.
I'm at work and don't have access to inventor to make a better drawing... But i can say now that i wont put the specific type of metal that is being used for the resistor...
Here is a paint drawing of my coin resistor idea. This part goes between the battery and the button assembly. And what i meant was the diameter of the metal insert for this part would be the same as the contacts that already exist in the button assembly now (which is roughly the same diameter as the positive contact on the battery) and the thickness would need to be tested to get the right amount of resistance to match what is currently used on the button.
(picpaste is being stupid sooooo -
http://www.picpaste.com/coin_resistor.jpg click that)
to be able to fit this piece in the same amount of space the button housing would need to be shortened along the length of the PV. If you look at my original drawing where the actual contacts are you can see a slightly different way that the spring is held in there. If the springs length is chosen correctly with the hole it fits into it would never lay over on the contacts.
Even those designs would need to be changed to fit the coin resistor in.
Another plus side is that if the spring on the end-cap of the PV that holds the batteries had enough play, the coin resistor could be removed and then you could use HV attys at a higher voltage. and i think i remember seeing that there is a longer 3.7v battery that will fit in the V2, which would enable 3.7v vaping without the resistor as well...
In short... my idea was only to get the resistor and the actual switch contacts away from each other in the same amount of space, without solder. I was also trying to visualize keeping the same opening that is cut in the tube itself. The least amount of parts that need to be changed the better.
There might be other things that are causing different peoples problems. The climate i'm in, is normally pretty dry. Take my same V2 to Louisiana and you might have other issues, ambient humidity
will change the rate of oxidation and things like that.
I'm pretty sure the
real electrical manufactures out there know what they're doing so coating with whatever they use for High duty cycle switches couldn't hurt, but you would HAVE to separate the resistor and button. otherwise the current will want to go through the coating and not the resistor metal.
Also you said something about the thickness of the coating. Most plating maxes out at a few thousands of an inch. Don't get me wrong, these coatings can be really hard core. Take Anodizing for instance... it's REALLY thin (.002" average - see:
Aluminum Anodizing Process and Design Guide) but if you've ever tried to machine a part that is already anodized you'd know how FREAKING HARD it is... you'll kill normal drills, endmills, and lathe inserts FAST. At our shop we used stuff that was to be thrown out anyways to get through the coating before doing any work on that part. And to furthermore explain, MOST machining processes use tolerances like + or - .005". Unless it's a bearing tolernace, Press fit, etc. The press fit on the contacts in the buttons probably has a WIDE + tolerance because it's being pressed into a soft material.
My english/grammar & whatever else you want to call it, has Always been shotty. I'm great with math and science (other than memorizing terms haha). so i'm sorry if this all doesn't make perfect sense. I'm really just trying to help... once i get some time i'll draw out these parts with updated details (shortening the housing and such...).