vaping doesn't suppress genes. Some genes are either active or inactive.
When the genes that trigger immune responses are inactive (suppressed)
that usually means there is nothing to trigger them into and active state.
PG and VG are antibacterial and antiviral. In the absence of pathological or
toxicological agents these genes would normally be in a inactive (suppressed)
state. There s no evidence that these genes would not become active if it
became necessary for them to do so. This is all mid 20th century high
school biology. Please note that I am not disagreeing with the data.
This is a classic case of taking the data and interpreting it in the worse
possible light. In the study the commenter is referring too it was to be
expected that in the absence of agents to trigger an immune response
the genes would be in an inactive state. The vapor didn't do anything
to the genes. The lack of pathogens or toxins caused the genes to become
inactive.
Regards
Mike
I don't know if any of this is true, but I totally believed it. Well done and well stated! OP, send them this.
