I-Inhale is Loaded with Mixed and Troubling Reviews
- Thread starter Sun Vaporer
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
The I-Inhale seems like a decent device to me now that I've got mine, it has potential, especially when compared with ecigs.
Here is my review thread -
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...5732-i-inhale-smokejuice-co-uk.html#post89714
Here is my review thread -
http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...5732-i-inhale-smokejuice-co-uk.html#post89714
Nice review Kate! Would you mind if I put a link to it on our website as an independent review for people to read?
I would especially like to reiterate one of the points you make. This device probably won't suit a newbie (in it's current state), or any one for that matter expecting a traditional ecig. We are however working on making it more user-friendly and finding ways of achieving the best results for use with e-liquids, so great possibilities are on the horizon...
I have just uploaded a second video on our website which includes an accessory breakdown and tips for new users or anyone else contemplating trying it.
I was quite surprised with the amount of vapour/puffs I got from 2 drips of Janty Virginia here(over 25!! it went on after the video stopped filming) ... this may however not be typical for all users but quite clearly more than possible. I think that the slightly improved function may be because I had previously been using a thick glycerine mix and some residue may have remained which added to the performance.
I will report more as improvements develop further...
Over and Out!
P.S. I notice that the edit function has been used to good affect once again, making my responses earlier seem a little harsher than necessary!
I would especially like to reiterate one of the points you make. This device probably won't suit a newbie (in it's current state), or any one for that matter expecting a traditional ecig. We are however working on making it more user-friendly and finding ways of achieving the best results for use with e-liquids, so great possibilities are on the horizon...
I have just uploaded a second video on our website which includes an accessory breakdown and tips for new users or anyone else contemplating trying it.
I was quite surprised with the amount of vapour/puffs I got from 2 drips of Janty Virginia here(over 25!! it went on after the video stopped filming) ... this may however not be typical for all users but quite clearly more than possible. I think that the slightly improved function may be because I had previously been using a thick glycerine mix and some residue may have remained which added to the performance.
I will report more as improvements develop further...
Over and Out!
P.S. I notice that the edit function has been used to good affect once again, making my responses earlier seem a little harsher than necessary!
Feel free to use that review Tim, you're welcome to it.
That bloomin' edit function annoys me, it casts doubt on the authenticity of any conversations. It was set to have a twenty minute limit for a while but all sorts of old stuff can be altered now, we can't even have access to original, unedited versions. It's a recipe for instability.
That bloomin' edit function annoys me, it casts doubt on the authenticity of any conversations. It was set to have a twenty minute limit for a while but all sorts of old stuff can be altered now, we can't even have access to original, unedited versions. It's a recipe for instability.
Thanks Kate - I'll probably put the link in at some point this week!
I know the edit function was discussed in another thread that was brought up a while ago which I contributed to... I guess with all the problems ECF has been going through it's probably taken a back seat for the time being until the forum's more stable...
Seems a bit spineless really to edit the tone of a post in your favour rather than to see a post through IMO - definitely not a fair representation of events. By that token, I could do the same, but would rather not lower myself to these games....
I know the edit function was discussed in another thread that was brought up a while ago which I contributed to... I guess with all the problems ECF has been going through it's probably taken a back seat for the time being until the forum's more stable...
Seems a bit spineless really to edit the tone of a post in your favour rather than to see a post through IMO - definitely not a fair representation of events. By that token, I could do the same, but would rather not lower myself to these games....
Yeah, don't do it, you can't unsay what has been said and it's daft to think you can. All it does is cast doubt on your honesty when people notice.
It sucks to think that posts can be engineered to make anyone look better or worse. It sucks even more to know that it's not just a theoretical possibility, it happens, this is only the most recent case I've seen. Heated discussions have been altered before.
If you've read that thread about editing you already know my feelings on the issue. I'm not going to pester Smokey Joe about it again, as you say, he probably has enough on his plate. Plenty of people don't think authenticity is important or want to be able to alter posts.
It sucks to think that posts can be engineered to make anyone look better or worse. It sucks even more to know that it's not just a theoretical possibility, it happens, this is only the most recent case I've seen. Heated discussions have been altered before.
If you've read that thread about editing you already know my feelings on the issue. I'm not going to pester Smokey Joe about it again, as you say, he probably has enough on his plate. Plenty of people don't think authenticity is important or want to be able to alter posts.
- Status
Similar threads
