Politics and money, if there's even a fundamental difference, is complicating the issue of e-cigarettes to a point of a nearly impenetrable lack of clarity.
We hear pharmaceutical companies oppose them because they stand to lose huge revenues generated by medical treatment for sick smokers.
Then we hear these same companies support it because they could bogart the devices and rake in profit from marketing them as a stop-smoking aid.
We hear the media bash them as dangerous, unregulated death tubes being used by a naive smoking populace.
We hear statistics that a startling number of health professionals believe that nicotine is the acting carcinogen in cigarettes.
Then we hear stifled research about the positive effects of nicotine. Then we hear hundreds of e-cigarette smokers spreading this information like we ought to believe what we're doing is as good as taking a vitamin.
We hear states, towns, and airports struggling to define and determine how to approach indoor vaping.
We hear government law officials reprimanding entities attempting to continue their long history of tobacco regulation.
And we hear state and local governments still flailing to regulate an as-yet unregulated, improperly researched device.
Then we hear that nicotine is not tobacco.
So what, in the world, is objective in this issue? Of course nothing!
I'm a happy vaper for now. I've just given up trying to make the case for anyone because it seems that now, for either side, there's no compelling case to make.
We hear pharmaceutical companies oppose them because they stand to lose huge revenues generated by medical treatment for sick smokers.
Then we hear these same companies support it because they could bogart the devices and rake in profit from marketing them as a stop-smoking aid.
We hear the media bash them as dangerous, unregulated death tubes being used by a naive smoking populace.
We hear statistics that a startling number of health professionals believe that nicotine is the acting carcinogen in cigarettes.
Then we hear stifled research about the positive effects of nicotine. Then we hear hundreds of e-cigarette smokers spreading this information like we ought to believe what we're doing is as good as taking a vitamin.
We hear states, towns, and airports struggling to define and determine how to approach indoor vaping.
We hear government law officials reprimanding entities attempting to continue their long history of tobacco regulation.
And we hear state and local governments still flailing to regulate an as-yet unregulated, improperly researched device.
Then we hear that nicotine is not tobacco.
So what, in the world, is objective in this issue? Of course nothing!
I'm a happy vaper for now. I've just given up trying to make the case for anyone because it seems that now, for either side, there's no compelling case to make.
