IPV Mini V2 ???

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sunburst

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 20, 2014
222
181
Williamsport, PA
I had major issues with this at 30W and having mini in the name. At 70W and a few minor niggles cleared up, I think it's a fantastic little piece. Depending on chip efficiency, 20A continuous batteries should be fine. 70W at .8 is 9A, at .2 it's 18.7A. Normal recommendations would apply, 25R, HE2, VTCs.
 

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
And I just now noticed that the black Mini v2 is 100% less tacky looking. Black is actually black, buttons are black, and the check for broccoli stuck in your teeth mirror display is now dark. Shame they couldn't murder out the battery cap too. And still can't figure out why it has a goat on it now.

HTB15yq_HXXXXXccXpXXq6xXFXXXl.jpg

I didn't even notice the satanic goat head till you pointed it out. I don't understand the need for any manufacturers to put their graffiti on stuff. Guess I'll have to rock some 90's Slayer tunes whilst I vape it.
 

Evi|grin

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 21, 2013
1,097
852

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota

Trailz

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 4, 2014
621
259
NE OH US
Nice, thanks! Never ordered from SV, but they are in WI....quite a bit closer to me, and price is better than vapenw. Had good experience ordering from SweetVapes?
I've done business with them and will do business with them again. Funny, this past month they've lowered some of their prices to match or beat VapeNW. Good stuff . . .
 

tc1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 26, 2011
2,218
1,494
Ohio
I have one of the first batches of the IPV2 and it's still my go to regulated mod at home these days. Never saw a need to upgrade until I saw the IPV mini v2. Love the form factor and at the originvape price I couldn't help myself. Went ahead and threw in a Mutation X v3 to my order as well because ... well ... what the heck.

Most of my vaping is around 35 watts and the Provari P3 was going to be my next purchase until the disappointment of its' 20 watt limit hit the streets. I was looking at the SX mini but given it's 3 times the price of the IPV mini v2 and roughly the same form factor I had a hard time justifying the extra coin. Most of the SX Mini features simply weren't enough to justify going with it. Step down doesn't really affect me given I vape around 35 watts and rarely build below .5 ohms. The "power ramp" feature would have been nice but really isn't that big of a deal to me. I do like that the ohm meter does to 0.00 and the SX 350 has slightly better power efficiency. But again, couldn't justify the huge difference in price. Especially given that the chips are made by the same manufacturer and will *most likely* have roughly the same life span. (And perhaps that was my biggest concern... as great as YiHi has been ... their chips simply aren't as time tested as high end mods using chip makers that have been around the block more times). When I'm paying under $100 that doesn't concern me all that much ... once I pay high end prices it simply does. Having said that, the SX mini is one sexy beast.

But this is about the IPV Mini v2 ... and I just splurged on a black one with a two tone carbon wrap from Jwraps (black and gold carbon). $18 including shipping with the JWRAPS10 code if anyone is interested.

For some reason, I've always been apprehensive about taking my IPV2 to work. I guess I just feel less damage could occur with a mechanical while at work. But I'm actually thinking of making this Mini2 my every day driver ... work included. I mean, it's more pocket friend than my IPV2 and frankly it was cheaper. It's getting harder and harder to use my mechs over a regulated high wattage device. Less can go wrong with a mechanical and I actually love the sleekness of them, but boy ... having no battery drop off is very nice once you get use to a specific higher wattage.

So I like others, am very interested in getting my hands on this sucker. Between the ergo-friendly design, battery design, and increased wattage ... feels like it might be a real winner.
 

juicynoos

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 27, 2014
1,036
981
"Paradox", French West Indies
I think it's supposed to be a ram :p never noticed it until it was mentioned here and already ordered from MVS and waiting for fedex to knoock at the door, hopefully later today.I will report back if I find any issues but don't anticipate any other than what is already known.

I notice the floating 510 is slotted and am wondering if it is adjustable or if that would have the same implications as the 1st run of the SXmini 350 where it caused damage and rendered the warranty invalid-anyone know?

edit- also, nearly forgot to mention this. the sx330 chip, it seems, does ramp up before settling down to the specified voltage which is not an all too undesirable feature and is likely intended don't you think?
 
Last edited:

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
OK all. I've been trying to read up on the features of these chips but am struggling. Can anyone explain to me in layman terms whether or not the sx330 has step down? And, further......please clarify the terms step-down and ramp-up for me.

A lot of this simply goes over my head......but what I can tell you is that I currently use the 20W Istick. While I have been happy overall, and consider it a great device for the $$..... I am confident that the spike in power gives me some issues with dry hits/ burning juice occasionally. Some of that is my less than stellar wick jobs, but I also think the device contributes to it.

I sense that the power is maintained much better by a higher end chip like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aikanae1

tc1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 26, 2011
2,218
1,494
Ohio
Step Down allows the device to output voltage LOWER than the batteries current voltage. For example, a 0.2 ohm coil at 11 watts is roughly 1.9volts. Chips with step down can output the 1.9 volts while chips without it will simply dump the batteries current voltage. The chip with step down WILL hit at 11 watts while the chip without step down simply won't. The SX330 does NOT have step down. So basically, don't build low sub-ohm coils if you plan to use low wattage on this chip.

Ramp up boosts the wattage higher than is set for a split second to warm the coil faster so you get an immediate strong hit. The SX330 doesn't officially have this feature either but someone was mentioning they thought it did this (by accident/natively)? Not sure on that.

Not sure on the 20 watt iStick but MOST chips these days are pretty reliable and accurate. Some are definitely more efficient and have better built in monitoring but chips have come a longggg way in the past year or two. Could be a device issue ... could be a wicking issue in your case. Not sure which.

But no question you can't deny some chips are better than others. For instance, the SX 350 is a superior chip to the SX 330. It's more power efficient, has more monitoring, and has a few extra features. Now is it worth the extra coin you'll pay? That's really up to each and every person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aikanae1

Bored2Tears

Super Member
Verified Member
Sep 26, 2014
713
1,076
Western South Dakota
Step Down allows the device to output voltage LOWER than the batteries current voltage. For example, a 0.2 ohm coil at 11 watts is roughly 1.9volts. Chips with step down can output the 1.9 volts while chips without it will simply dump the batteries current voltage. The chip with step down WILL hit at 11 watts while the chip without step down simply won't. The SX330 does NOT have step down. So basically, don't build low sub-ohm coils if you plan to use low wattage on this chip.

Ramp up boosts the wattage higher than is set for a split second to warm the coil faster so you get an immediate strong hit. The SX330 doesn't officially have this feature either but someone was mentioning they thought it did this (by accident/natively)? Not sure on that.

Not sure on the 20 watt iStick but MOST chips these days are pretty reliable and accurate. Some are definitely more efficient and have better built in monitoring but chips have come a longggg way in the past year or two. Could be a device issue ... could be a wicking issue in your case. Not sure which.

But no question you can't deny some chips are better than others. For instance, the SX 350 is a superior chip to the SX 330. It's more power efficient, has more monitoring, and has a few extra features. Now is it worth the extra coin you'll pay? That's really up to each and every person.

Your explanation is exactly what I thought it meant, so thanks for confirming that. So, if I get one of the slick new clearos with the .5 ohm coils, on a fresh 4.2V battery ....I will not actually be able to step down lower than 4.2 v. Which should be fine as most people report that those attys do well at 35W.

The ramp up feature I would think is a good thing, but not a big deal for me if it truly doesn't have it. I don't mind a short delay for the coil to come up to temp....I'm accustomed to that.

Likely a lot of the issues I am having with the istick have to do with inconsistent wicking jobs and not paying attention to the fact that I've got a fresh battery. So in some cases I am probably feeding my coil more power than I need or intended to. There are times however that I think I'm getting more power output than it says.
 

Croak

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 13, 2012
2,582
4,449
60
Right behind you...
Busardo's test of the IPV Mini does show a "boost" on the SX330 of about an extra volt, for about a second, then a smooth ramp down to expected voltage.

http://youtu.be/nisQf54DnVc?t=25m5s

My thinking is that it's by design, since the later SX350 does the same thing, albeit with user control when using the firing mode feature.

And the IPV Mini/SX330 does a "simulated" step-down via PWM mode, also shown a couple minutes later in the video above. Goes as low as 1.5v at 5w on a 0.6 ohm coil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread