I see a lot of similarities between the two (KFL & Magma). I know one is a not to perfect RTA the other a rda. Making the KFL a tank meant a few compromises with the microscopic deck. One thing that is right is the bottom air hole. Many people will tell you that the KFL functions better as an RDA and I agree. and I believe others have to.
The magma I see many improvements on the design and many influences of the KFL design on the Magma, except now you have two air flow bottom feed holes and a bottom holding tank. To this day I don't trust the KFL on a 13 hr journey called work, to many tools required if something goes wrong. The magma I actually think I could.
And the flavor is better with the true dual coil dual bottom air fed design with the magma gives you both advatages of each design.
The magma doesn't get a lot of praise around here and I can't figure out why, possibly the same reason as before with the KLF, its the first flavor making RDA we've seen in a while.. I'm not a cloud chaser so don't know how it stacks up there but for flavor the Magma seems to be tops? Or has someone taken this concept even futher?
The magma I see many improvements on the design and many influences of the KFL design on the Magma, except now you have two air flow bottom feed holes and a bottom holding tank. To this day I don't trust the KFL on a 13 hr journey called work, to many tools required if something goes wrong. The magma I actually think I could.
And the flavor is better with the true dual coil dual bottom air fed design with the magma gives you both advatages of each design.
The magma doesn't get a lot of praise around here and I can't figure out why, possibly the same reason as before with the KLF, its the first flavor making RDA we've seen in a while.. I'm not a cloud chaser so don't know how it stacks up there but for flavor the Magma seems to be tops? Or has someone taken this concept even futher?