Just gotta love the FDA! NOT!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

lovinlife

Full Member
Jun 4, 2010
31
0
Spokane, WA
These people make no sense to me! They will do everything they can to ban e-cigs and yet here they are saying "yes we know that AVANDIA can cause heart attacks but we will keep it on the market. (And the little boy said hmmmmm)

FDA panel votes to keep Avandia on the market - Health - Diabetes - msnbc.com

FDA panel votes to keep Avandia on the market

Agency to make final decision on the diabetes drug in coming months


A majority of U.S. government health experts has voted to keep the controversial diabetes pill Avandia on the market despite evidence that it increases the risk of heart attack.

A panel of Food and Drug Administration advisers voted 20-12 against withdrawing GlaxoSmithKline's once-blockbuster drug. Panelists who voted to keep the drug on the market were split between several options, including adding new warning labels and restricting use of the drug.

The Food and Drug Administration has convened the panel to help untangle reams of conflicting data over whether the GlaxoSmithKline drug increases heart risks.

Despite an earlier vote that Avandia increases heart risks, panelists said the evidence wasn't strong enough to remove it from the market.

The agency will make the final decision in the coming months but usually follows the advice of its advisory committees.

Avandia's U.S. sales were just 1.5 percent of Glaxo's 2009 revenues, but investors feared the company could face more lawsuits if the drug was forced from the market.

The advisory panel heard two days of sharply conflicting opinions from inside and outside the FDA, and reviewed hundreds of pages of data, before coming to its decision.
Newsvine poll: Should Avandia remain on the market?
The debate on Avandia's safety has raged since warnings were placed on the drug in 2007 saying some research linked the drug to a higher heart attack risk but the data was "inconclusive."
© 2010 msnbc.com
 

Driver

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 28, 2010
155
8
Sacramento, CA.
Hows the saying go......."follow the money" , this is GlaxoSmithKline's annual public report. Page 9 has some fun reading, and it looks like H1N1 really paid off well for them. Now as a simple truck driver even I can figure out why the FDA and any other government branch votes the way they do. You can buy me for a price also.

http://www.gsk.com/investors/reps09/GSK-Report-2009-full.pdf
 

Automaton

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2010
2,997
73
US
Being a diabetic myself I knew a few people that had tried this when it first came out. They didn't have heart attacks but it didn't do anything for them either...

The FDA approves a lot of drugs that don't actually work. Yes, really.

I distinctly remember a scandal a year or two back where Schering-Plough was making millions of a cholestrol drug that had never been proven to lower cholestrol. And indeed, independent studies showed it didn't.

Still, the FDA didn't even bat a lash for over a year, and even now, I believe it's still on the market.

Why?

Because it makes money.
 

lovinlife

Full Member
Jun 4, 2010
31
0
Spokane, WA
Skuggi - I understand that one all to well. The sad part that not all get away that lucky. One of my kids who has been a diabetic since she was just a child and who has gotten worse over the years, was put on this medicine and was in the hospital with side effects. Wheither it was from this medicine or a combination of things she still ended up in the hospital. Just because someone was told that it was a better medince for her.
 

THE

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 4, 2008
1,247
21
USA
The FDA is crooked and stupid and they've got no choice. If they tried to go straight, they'd be shut down due to lack of funding. The government has been strong-arming us for health forever. This one guy was giving away bread or some thing.. had a warehouse full. It was curing some common ailment. The govt shut it down for no reason, let everything go bad. So we had to buy some pill. Anyone got the details of that story? Think it was several decades ago.
 

cyberwolf

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 22, 2009
2,217
403
Coral Springs, FL
"Faced with conflicting and less-than-conclusive scientific evidence, a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel recommended Wednesday that the controversial diabetes drug Avandia remain on the market."

It's disgusting how "less-than-conclusive" evidence means two totally different things depending on whether large amounts of money have been paid or not. In this case it's a reason to leave Avandia on the shelves, in the case of the e-cig it's a reason to take them off.
 

D103

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 18, 2010
660
105
cedar rapids, iowa
Excellent point cyberwolf - also the FDA's own study links Avandia with 48,000 heart attacks, strokes and other medical problems in medicare patients between 1999 and 2009 - and it remains ON THE MARKET?!?!?!? Compare this with electronic cigarettes being on the world market seven years and US market a little over two years with NOT ONE documented case of serious injury or illness! And yet the FDA is in Federal Court trying to claim this technology "poses a significant threat" to Public Health. Have they not yet, quite clearly and disgustingly, excoriated themselves from knowing anything about "significant threats or Public Health" through their corrupt and reckless actions?
There is absolutely No Shame left in any of our governmental institutions - NONE - and absent shame, which is arguably the most effective, non-violent agent of change,... abuse, tyranny and violence become ever more likely.
 
Last edited:

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
"Faced with conflicting and less-than-conclusive scientific evidence, a Food and Drug Administration advisory panel recommended Wednesday that the controversial diabetes drug Avandia remain on the market."

It's disgusting how "less-than-conclusive" evidence means two totally different things depending on whether large amounts of money have been paid or not. In this case it's a reason to leave Avandia on the shelves, in the case of the e-cig it's a reason to take them off.
Oh snap!!!!

Gotta admit, I didn't see that coming.
;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread