Just saw this

Status
Not open for further replies.

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
Key word there is SIMILAR. And it is produced within the body, not taken into the body. BIG differences. That's a neurochemical, not a drug, and the fact that it's similar to THC doesn't make THC a natural part of our bodily functions.



The stuff we have in our brain is identical to thc. We need it. We need it to manage pain and we need it to stimulate our appetite among other things. That is why marijuana is now an FDA approved medicine in the form of Marinol and a couple other trade names.
 

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
leaford, I believe you are right about Congress and/or the courts not allowing FDA oversight of tobacco. I still think it is hypocritical, however. It is especially hypocritical of Congress. Electronic Vaporizers are simply an "alternative" method of inhaling a mixture of substances just like cigarettes are a method of inhaling a mixture of substances, except the tobacco mixture happens to have 400+ cancer causing agents included that is not found in the "alternative". But lets (our government) continue to support/allow the cancer causing method but regulate at best or ban at worst, the better alternative. There has never been a better example of "hypocracy".

Vaporizing is also the next step in the evolution of fire.
 

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
Because the pharmaceutical companies came up with a wonderful way to create lifelong customers. Get parents to think the answer to the behavioral issues in their children are not by diet changes but with a pill. This, in turn, gets kids used to popping pills and then in turn, creates adults who think they NEED a pill to be better.

It is no different than what the cigarette companies have done. The pharmaceutical companies simply do it behind the curtain of government approval.



Well exactly. That is what it is all about isnt it? Money. Its not about what is safe or scientifically proven to be beneficial. The FDA couldnt care less. In fact it makes its money from things not being safe. That is what gets you to the doctors to buy pills. The pharma companies make money the FDA makes money and the doctors make money.
 

LaceyUnderall

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 4, 2008
2,568
5
USA and Canada
Well exactly. That is what it is all about isnt it? Money. Its not about what is safe or scientifically proven to be beneficial. The FDA couldnt care less. In fact it makes its money from things not being safe. That is what gets you to the doctors to buy pills. The pharma companies make money the FDA makes money and the doctors make money.

Exactly. And you still have a right to self medicate yourself without government or pharmaceutical intervention.

In an earlier post, I noted a link to a chemical company and how they extract nicotine for pharmaceutical grade nicotine. IT WAS HORRIFYING! What ever happened to simple extraction with no chemicals? Sure, the effects might not be as strong, but who says that I can't go that route?

This also comes down to a debate over Eastern vs. Western medicine practices. Why do you think that insurance companies don't cover trips to non-Western medical facilities? Accupuncture being one of those not covered on many plans.
 
Cigarettes, at the end of the day - according to US courts are lethal weapons whose victims get paid huge settlements. Those $ettlements represent the price of admission for the tobacco companies to kill more people a day than all the gun fatalities put together.

Let's get away from the apples to oranges comparisons.

The device we love and promote was conceived as a whole different animal. It is the "harm reduction program".

Not much has to change, just repaint some racing cars with e-cigs logos.
 

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Its interesting that you bring up ADD... do you know what ADD medication really is? Its methamphetimine.... street name speed or crystal ..... That is what doctors are prescribing to kids with ADD and those meds are approved by the FDA. So if speed or crystal .... is approved by the FDA then why is it an illegal drug?

Again, no. LOW doses of pharmaceutical grade .... are sometimes, but RARELY prescribed for ADD. Most ADD medications are dextroamphetamine sulfate, or methylphenidate, which may sound similar, but aren't the same.
 

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
So basically if the FDA says you can do the drug you can do the drug except when you want to do the drug that the FDA has said you can do but you dont get permission to do it first? That is just too much of a communistic government for my liking. I mean think about it. Nicotine is FDA approved to stop smoking, PG is FDA approved, and the flavorings are food grade. So individually they are okay. You can chew nicotine gum you can buy it right over the counter now without a perscription. You can get all the PG you want and its real cheap. You can get all the flavorings you want. Yet supposedly you cant combine all three together and vaporize them?? That makes no sense whatsoever.
 

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
STONY BROOK, N.Y., March 24, 2009 – Dale Deutsch, Ph.D., Professor of Biochemistry and Cell Biology at Stony Brook University and colleagues discovered a new molecular mechanism for the processing of endocannabinoids, brain compounds similar to THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, and essential in physiological processes such as pain, appetite, and memory. Reported online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the finding could pave the way for new medicines for pain, addiction, appetite control and other disorders.

The stuff we have in our brain is identical to thc. We need it. We need it to manage pain and we need it to stimulate our appetite among other things. That is why marijuana is now an FDA approved medicine in the form of Marinol and a couple other trade names.

No, what we have in our brains are ENDOcannabinoids. They are SIMILAR, but not IDENTICAL, to the PHYTOcannabinoids that are found in cannabis. Cannabis affects us the way it does because we have neurochemicals similar to them. But they aren't the same.
EDIT: Oops, forgot the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocannabinoids#Endocannabinoids
 
Last edited:

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
I mean opium barbituates speed and now marijuana are all FDA approved in some form or another. They call it by different names and the pharma companies manufacture them and sell them but you can only use them if you have permission to from a doctor. So if that is the case then why cant you just medicate yourself with these things?
 

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
leaford, I believe you are right about Congress and/or the courts not allowing FDA oversight of tobacco. I still think it is hypocritical, however. It is especially hypocritical of Congress. Electronic Vaporizers are simply an "alternative" method of inhaling a mixture of substances just like cigarettes are a method of inhaling a mixture of substances, except the tobacco mixture happens to have 400+ cancer causing agents included that is not found in the "alternative". But lets (our government) continue to support/allow the cancer causing method but regulate at best or ban at worst, the better alternative. There has never been a better example of "hypocracy".

AH, I thought you meant it was hypocritical of the FDA in particular. I agree it is appears hypocritical if you view the government as one whole entity. But in this case, I see it more as a case of different entities with different agendas, which isn't hypocritical.
 

leaford

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
May 1, 2008
6,863
432
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
How do we define necessary though? I mean all drugs are plant based right? After a certain amount our body stops breaking down sugar and stores it in the form of fat. Too much sugar intake can cause diabetes high blood pressure migraine headaches and a whole slew of other adverse health problems. Our body actually gets all the sugar it needs from normal food. All plants contain sugar.

Too much sugar can cause harm. It is still a normal part of our metabolism, and thus not a drug. And we define necessary as that without which we will die, like food or oxygen. It's really very simple.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
Not much has to change, just repaint some racing cars with e-cigs logos.[/quote]

When are you guys going to step away from the term "electronic cigarette"!!! We will never be able to change perceptions using that term! When I explain the device to non-tobacco users, I call it what it is, an electronic vaporizer and make a comparison to vaporizers used in a bedroom when some has a cold. You supplers need to give this some thought!
 

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
What is funny is that speed has been found to have beneficial properties so its regulated, opium has been found to have beneficial properties so its regulated, barbituates have been found to have beneficial properties so its regulated, marijuana has been found to have beneficial properties so its regulated, nicotine has been found to have beneficial properties so now they are trying to regulate it but alcohol has no beneficial properties whatsoever and you can drink all of that you want to.
 

drewterry

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 30, 2009
89
0
49
Too much sugar can cause harm. It is still a normal part of our metabolism, and thus not a drug. And we define necessary as that without which we will die, like food or oxygen. It's really very simple.



PRINCETON, N.J. -- It's a common refrain: "I'm addicted to sugar." Now a study by Princeton University psychologists suggests that such urges really may be a form of addiction, sharing some of the physiological characteristics of drug dependence.
Although the term "sugar addiction" often appears in magazines and on television, scientists had not demonstrated that such a thing as sugar dependency really exists, said neuroscientist Bart Hoebel, who led the study. Hoebel and colleagues studied rats that were induced to binge on sugar and found that they exhibited telltale signs of withdrawal, including "the shakes" and changes in brain chemistry, when the effects of the sweets were blocked. These signs are similar to those produced by drug withdrawal.
 

Vince1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 6, 2009
1,051
6
Down South, USA.
The problem with marijuana or any mind and mood altering drug is not so much the physical harm but rather the psychological effects it has in long term use. After a person uses a substance like this for several weeks their brain waves start to change and this causes the person to think, act and react in slightly different ways. The "new personality" created in this way often leads the person to make different choices then they would normally. With .... use people deprive their self of sleep and loose higher brain function. People don't function well after staying awake for long periods of time. After stopping use of marijuana brain wave studies show that a persons chartings will return to previous readings after around 60 days, with .... use it can take up to 90 days or more before you begin to think and act exactly as you did before use.
I see people every day who come up with every excuse in the book to justify their drug use. The simple fact is that you don't need one. You make your choice to use because you want to get high and that's all. The sooner a person can admit that, the better off they are and they can stop hiding behind all those lame excuses. Rationalizations and justifications just allow a person to keep using and not have to face any guilt or shame about what they are doing.
I have had people tell me that "they" should be allowed to drink and drive because they drive better after a couple drinks. Can you imagine?
How would you feel if the pilot of the 747 you were on announced that this was his 16th straight flight and we will take off as soon as the co-pilot arrived with another 8-ball.

Vince.cadc (Certified Alcohol and Drug Abuse Counselor)
 
Last edited:

Boomer

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 29, 2009
172
0
45
Well then maybe you can explain to me why marijuana works so well has limited side effects that are not harmful at all and no withdrawl symptoms where as sugar causes all manner of deadly disease and has withdrawl symptoms that are identical to the withdrawl symptoms from drugs.

I have no problem with anybody using marijuana what so ever, it is a personal choice. Quite a few of my friends smoke it but i choose not to as i do not enjoy the feelings, yes i did try it during college but even then it gave me severe paranoia.

Yes i partly agree with you in the fact that natural marijuana has mostly tempory side effects but cannot say the same about the GM stuff that is about now, some of these versions can cause quite severe psychosis with long term use. My biggest issue with marijuana is not that though but the fact that certain friends of mine mentioning no names lol plan to do all of these things with me then after a joint all of these things never happen lol they just cannot be bothered and would rather sit indoors playing computer games and ordering a pizza ;)

Cheers Lee.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread