loong totem V11..

Status
Not open for further replies.

trog100

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 23, 2008
3,240
13
UK
The V11 is our newest item. It is checked now.We haven't put on the market.The battery capacity is 3000MAH.
Can you please tell us do you want how many sets quantity?
Our MOQ order is 500sets.

i aint got the price but the battery looks big enough to do the job.. its the one that looks like a zippo lighter.. the lighter is the battery in essence.. 3000 mah is sweet..

trog
 

trog100

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 23, 2008
3,240
13
UK
i think u just swing the bar to one side and suck on it.. the bar looks to hold the atomizer in place while the device isnt being used.. and stop crud getting into it..

the key is it dosnt look like a real cig.. this means it can take a decent sized battery.. this affects two things.. the actual run time.. say fifteen times longer than a normal e cig battery..

but above all it affects the batteries life time.. being as its not being flogged to death each time a puff is taken it will not wear out in two minutes..

it should give good performance for months.. loong totem are building a device for the likes of me.. no atomzer wear out.. it get thrown every time its used and a battery that wont need replacing every couple of weeks...

the zippo part is in essence the battery.. i expected smaller but they say its a 3000 mah one.. this is my cart horse battery not a bloody donkey on steroids that dies a rapid death..

so far its looking good..

trog

ps.. its just a different shaped e cig with a decent sized battery exactly like i would make if i could be arsed to..
 
Last edited:

trog100

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 23, 2008
3,240
13
UK
Very interesting. But why, WHY do they insist on having the "...." styled after a real cigarette?

I've no problem with designs that work that look nothing like real cigarettes, but having that flecked .... is just stoopid. IMO.

yes i would guess if the idea takes off they will improve the appearance.. i think this one is an intermediate design simply using their existing atomizer which in itself is a complete re-think on atomizer design..

this is only my thoughts on the subject but the original ruyan "like smoke" design was intended for actual real smokers to use where they couldnt smoke their real cigarettes.. not as an alternative to real cigarettes..

now the full time alternative to real cigarettes idea has arrived the things need a re-design.. there is less need for the device to look like a real cigarette and something that actually works as a full time use device can be produced..

the zippo lighter with a cig .... sticking out is silly thow.. but is the market ready or anything else yet.. dunno..

trog
 

Nazareth

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 14, 2008
1,277
17
USA
Very interesting. But why, WHY do they insist on having the "...." styled after a real cigarette?

I've no problem with designs that work that look nothing like real cigarettes, but having that flecked .... is just stoopid. IMO.

I was thinking abotu this V-11 last night & thought if they made it look more liek a 'nicotine inhaler' instread of a cigg, people might be more accepting when they see it & we explain it's a nicotine dilivery device intended to help cut down on real smoking- with hte ecigg looking like an actual cigg, I think people are less accepting & think "Yeah right, it's still a cig" & a few peopel I showed hte device to - the vapor- couldn't fathom that it was vapor & not actual smoke. It would be fantastic if we could get a device that has two vapors to hcoose from- one we can exhale and see hte big billowing clouds, and one for public areas where we want to bem ore discrete & the vapor totally absorbs i nthe lungs if we inhale- that way we could sit in a resteraunt, get out nicotine without people goign bonkers over clouds of vapor. I know I'd personally use such a device gladly in public & just do the exhaled vapor when not around public- Heck, I';d love ot have a vapor that absorbed in lungs for house use when company is over too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread