Low volume of vapor

[Blinkyrocket]

I think the reason I'm commonly misunderstood is because I talk in the way that I talk to myself. I'm constantly doubting and debating myself so it's not uncommon for me to say something I don't actually believe as if I do believe it. Like, I speak in "What ifs" a lot. Also, the way I doubt myself so much, it's sort of an OCD habit designed to catch anxious thoughts and disregard them but I also started doing that for everything, questioning everything. So, when I say stuff maybe "confidently" or seem a little bit cocky (more likely the latter), it may seem as if I fully believe what I say but I say it confidently or cockily because I taught myself to be confident, and it worked, it's a habit now for me to just speak my mind, seemingly arrogantly. It's just because I used to be shy though. Also, because I doubt myself often to make sure I'm as close to the right answer as I can be, I like to be corrected by people on subjects that I wouldn't otherwise have enough interest in to find it out myself, like the nicotine "OD" thing, I'm thankful for the info that I was wrong. At first, I obviously got defensive, but ultimately I'm thankful I was able to learn something new that, honestly, I "should" have already known.
Oh, and on the rudeness bad or good thing. To be sure, I think that when rudeness involves the use of force or coercion, then it becomes an absolutely terrible and dangerous thing.

 

[Coastal Cowboy]

They're all box mods. As opposed to tube mods. Tube mods are cylindrical, box mods aren't.

Edit: Yes, the Pico is the one in the middle.

 

[Blinkyrocket]

They're all box mods. As opposed to tube mods. Tube mods are cylindrical, box mods aren't.

Edit: Yes, the Pico is the one in the middle.

Oh, I assume box mods have better battery and storage? Idk why they would sacrifice the sleek nature of the cylindrical ones for nothing. I mean, I do kind of like the look of the box mods but it's still not as pretty as the tube mods.

 

[retired1]

This thread is done. Still going through and cleaning things up, but some of you are about to find out we're serious about the rules here.

 

[retired1]

I was lying somewhat about the nicotine overdose, I don't actually remember exactly where I heard it, some article I think.

Around here, you need to back up claims with facts. Otherwise you're going to get called on it.

It's called choice-supportive bias, sort of works the same way with people. I wasn't using scare tactics, or bolstering an argument by re-editing arguments. I re-edit them for the first reason. You requested information for the claims that didn't matter. What actually mattered was the nicotine brain levels and the rapid spike etc. If I was right about people vaping more nicotine when switching from tobacco, it would provide even more proof for my theory. Being wrong about that part doesn't completely detract from the theory I was actually making. Only if people consumed less WTA than nicotine would my theory have a leg to support itself.

Ummmm, going back to edit after being quoted doesn't work either.

This is also the reason why I was willing to go off topic, I just wanted to freakin' talk to people.

Going off topic is against the rules here. If you want to discuss a different matter, create a new thread in the appropriate forum.

I don't trust you.... And, while I don't view rudeness as good, I don't view it as bad either.

Rude is bad here. VERY bad and incurs the wrath of the staff.

This thread will remain closed.