Mark-T Infinity Atomizer
- Thread starter mark78
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Would it be possible to modify the design to allow for it or to come up with another one? I know a lot of Reonauts (see signature). And even the most hardcore fanatics among them immediately ask "Will this work on a Reo?" if they're lucky enough to get a drag off of mine.
And hear me out, this COULD be a match made in heaven, now that I think about it. Bottom juicers tend to suck out excess juice back into the bottle once it's released. And a T on a Reo, unlike a conventional 510 atty, wouldn't get it's air inlet holes clogged up by repeated juicing. And the sucking out of excess juice would eliminate the problems of over dripping. PM sent.
And hear me out, this COULD be a match made in heaven, now that I think about it. Bottom juicers tend to suck out excess juice back into the bottle once it's released. And a T on a Reo, unlike a conventional 510 atty, wouldn't get it's air inlet holes clogged up by repeated juicing. And the sucking out of excess juice would eliminate the problems of over dripping. PM sent.
totally with you on this Clyde; I have 3 reos (and an RSM, couple of Du Bocage...)
Reos are absolutely the best, most reliable etc mods; what I want is to be able to REBUILD my atty's.
is there a repairable atty that CAN be used on a REO?
Reos are absolutely the best, most reliable etc mods; what I want is to be able to REBUILD my atty's.
is there a repairable atty that CAN be used on a REO?
PLEASE PLEASE..... make a version with the holes so all of us REO people can use your fantastic atty!
I believe it would require a complete re-design to work on bottom fed mods, don't try to drill your Mark-T Atty unless you want a beautiful but useless piece of equipment.
As I understand it, no. (BTW...I've already bugged Mark about it and Centin about it, further communications would be pointless for now.) I hope one them can have their magic elves start on such a project.
I imagine a sturdy box like the Reo Grand...with VW and a rebuildable atty. Easily pocketed with a AW 18650 1600 or 2000mah battery. Think about it, the size of a pack of cigarettes with all day juice and battery supply onboard, that you could control the heat and customize it to your juice, and easily whip out a mini screwdriver and stick on a fresh coil and wick if the old one popped or diminished for pennies. Even if that puppy cost $300, it would be worth it.
Such a combo comes out, every other modder might as well pack 'er up and go home. I wonder what all those chinese factories would do then with no more disposable attys to make..
...oh yeah, they'd copy the design and undercut the price!
Still with you Clyde... seems like we want the same thing here!
i DID here a rumour that Robert was perhaps planning to make a re-buildable... probably just that though; Oh well, we can live in hope eh!
i DID here a rumour that Robert was perhaps planning to make a re-buildable... probably just that though; Oh well, we can live in hope eh!
Possibly. But then again, he is a practical man. If Mark or someone else came up with a rebuildable that would work, I could see Robert happily pointing his fans at whoever was making it, and moving onto his next project.
And you can't believe every rumor you hear...the one that I'm collaborating with a talented machinist to improve bulli a2 bases and see if bottom feeding is a possibility is utter nonsense.
<At least the last part is....sigh>
And you can't believe every rumor you hear...the one that I'm collaborating with a talented machinist to improve bulli a2 bases and see if bottom feeding is a possibility is utter nonsense.
<At least the last part is....sigh>
Last edited:
Tried the tank out - I was pleasantly surprised with it's performance with a 100% PG liquid, as I had tried out the Ego-T before and didn't care for it. Overall I prefer it in drip mode, but I can see using the tank from time to time. And it looks pretty nice on the black satin provari!
As I understand it, the problem with this is that the hole in the body part has to be drilled in exactly the right place for each lower part so unless customers wanted to drill their own hole, supplying a separate Type B part could be problematic.
maybe there is a misunderstanding Lisa.Question is if Mark will produce an upgrade part the upper cone for Tank B, Quetion is not for "DYI"cone 
An upgrade cone would require the customer to drill out the air inlet hole themselves to ensure it is properly placed, unless they wanted to mail the whole atty back to Mark.
Exactly my point, people wouldn't want a DIY cone, but that is the only way it could be done, other than retailing a complete new product with the hole already in place.maybe there is a misunderstanding Lisa.Question is if Mark will produce an upgrade part the upper cone for Tank B, Quetion is not for "DYI"cone
It's the same way with a Bulli, and I suspect it has something to do with how the threads on the bases are made, no two seem to be exactly alike. The air hole has to be drilled so it is precisely to the side of, and between, the two screws for optimum performance.
The cone must be placed onto the base piece and marked where the hole should be placed to ensure it's in the right place. With a bulli, you have to drill the hole yourself on the 'downgrade' tube for this reason, or order it at the same time as your tank kit and inform the maker that you want to the two to match so he'll drill the hole for you.
If every piece was exactly the same, this wouldn't be a necessity, but that's not the case; I prefer to think of it as 'old world' precision craftsmanship.
Lisa my lovely, how are you doing this fine morning?
The cone must be placed onto the base piece and marked where the hole should be placed to ensure it's in the right place. With a bulli, you have to drill the hole yourself on the 'downgrade' tube for this reason, or order it at the same time as your tank kit and inform the maker that you want to the two to match so he'll drill the hole for you.
If every piece was exactly the same, this wouldn't be a necessity, but that's not the case; I prefer to think of it as 'old world' precision craftsmanship.
Lisa my lovely, how are you doing this fine morning?
That's exactly the reason, Clyde, the threads begin and end in a different place on each base, so it's not possible to make one body that fits all. Returning parts to Mark to drill the holes wouldn't be workable solution, both logistically and economically, but perhaps Mark would be able to make some complete kits available for those that wanted that option.
Doing great, Clyde, thanks for asking.
Doing great, Clyde, thanks for asking.
I may be bad understanding the system Mark-T. I thought that the principle is the same as parts of A2-T from Bulli. On Bulli is need for upgrade from tank A to Tank B only one piece - last cone. Part with atomizer and thorn with wick and mash is still same one...I'm sorry..
OK, so - prepare Mark new version Mark-T for tank XL? Tank A is little for day vaping
OK, so - prepare Mark new version Mark-T for tank XL? Tank A is little for day vaping
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
