now wait a minute....nothing is over....
this was the appeal moade by the FDA of the original case just asking for a temporary stay...
we're starting to get the cart before the horse...
the original case... the ruling Judge Leon gave was in reguards only to the siezing of shipments which he gave his opinion on saying that they shouldn't being siezed because they should fall under the tobacco act and not the drug and cosmetic act... his ruling was only on that...
the FDA filed for a stay pending appeal....stay was granted (so they could continue to seize shipments)
but now the appeal was lost...peanding an appeal of that
so it's back to the lower courts now...
all that was really said in THIS decision was that they affirmed the lower court's ruling and how Judge Leon interpreted the law...that the FDA has no jurisdiction to block shipments based on their belief that they are drug delivery devices.. that the lower court was correct in saying that under the tobacco act they could not be blocked...
this was the appeal moade by the FDA of the original case just asking for a temporary stay...
we're starting to get the cart before the horse...
the original case... the ruling Judge Leon gave was in reguards only to the siezing of shipments which he gave his opinion on saying that they shouldn't being siezed because they should fall under the tobacco act and not the drug and cosmetic act... his ruling was only on that...
the FDA filed for a stay pending appeal....stay was granted (so they could continue to seize shipments)
but now the appeal was lost...peanding an appeal of that
so it's back to the lower courts now...
all that was really said in THIS decision was that they affirmed the lower court's ruling and how Judge Leon interpreted the law...that the FDA has no jurisdiction to block shipments based on their belief that they are drug delivery devices.. that the lower court was correct in saying that under the tobacco act they could not be blocked...