I just read a decent article by Matt Salmon. I can't post links yet, but if you search the entry's title: "Opposing View: A Much Needed Alternative", you'll find it on a USA Today web site.
Matt Salmon writes -- Opposing View: A Much Needed Alternative
- Thread starter Dolly
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
It shows the date at the bottom of the article I believe...
"Posted at 12:20 AM/ET, November 04, 2009 in USA TODAY editorial | Permalink"
"Posted at 12:20 AM/ET, November 04, 2009 in USA TODAY editorial | Permalink"
Your wish is my command, Angel. After all, I owe you!
Opposing view: A much-needed alternative - Opinion - USATODA
Feel free to Digg my comment and to leave your own comment as well.
Last edited:
You will notice that his article is in response to an op ed from the USA Today editorial board that also appeared today called, "Our opinion on public health: E-cigarettes pose risks" Look that one up and then let's all go and comment on both of them.
Notice the ridiculousness of the reference to China? The mention of a refusal for testing? Wrapping the statements of a few into the sentiment of the entire e-cig community?
All of these are points to take exception to.
Notice the ridiculousness of the reference to China? The mention of a refusal for testing? Wrapping the statements of a few into the sentiment of the entire e-cig community?
All of these are points to take exception to.
Hey KickASH! A convenient link for your comment: Debate on public health - Our opinion: E-cigarettes pose risks - Opinion - USATODAY.com
Thanmks for the link posting, additional research and congrats guys! ^_^ Warms my vapor-ridden heart... 
We need more of this in the mainstream. Somebodys gotta tell the truth and expose the lies.
- Status
Similar threads
