McCormick expensive recipes

[Visus]

Noone really makes Mccormick juices(I see why/ expensive)
I was tired of same Loranns flavors tried it and was surprised
Loranns is so much stronger but not by much

Its awesome
MC Cormick Extracts

Coconut Raspberry Vanilla
10ml 12mg
50/50


Ingredient mls Drops % of Total

VG with 60mg Nicotine 2 40 20 %

PG zero Nicotine 0.7 14 7 %

VG zero Nicotine 2.95 59 30 %

H2O 0.05 1 .5 %

Flavoring Coconut 2 40 20 %

Flavoring Raspberry 2 40 20 %

Flavoring Pure Vanilla 0.3 6 3 %

Steep 3 days it is good immediately after mix then awesome each day

Two really easy recipes
Mc Cormick Mint
15% of mix

Mc Cormick Butter Rum 3-5 day steep needed
20% of mix
5% vanilla

 

[buffaloguy]

Diacetyl. Look it up and make sure what you are vaping doesnt contain it.

Theres a reason people dont use Mckormicks.
http://www.profileshowcase.com/Product/DEFAULT/000016/30629?PRINT=Y

Theres also a reason people should read the warnings and stickies before making ejuices.

I just saved your life. You are welcome.

Im sorry if this sounded harsh but you HAVE NOT done your homework.

 

[Jfaria1891]

"Lorannes is so much stronger but not by much"
That statement botheres the hell out of me.
So contradicting

Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Visus]

Diacetyl. Look it up and make sure what you are vaping doesnt contain it.

Theres a reason people dont use Mckormicks.
http://www.profileshowcase.com/Product/DEFAULT/000016/30629?PRINT=Y

Theres also a reason people should read the warnings and stickies before making ejuices.

I just saved your life. You are welcome.

Im sorry if this sounded harsh but you HAVE NOT done your homework.

Awesome

I read they had stopped using diacetyl in all their products. This product ingredient listing may be previous to new flavor profiles. circa 2011-12

Apr 3, 2013 - McCormick brand. ..... Most manufacturers have removed diacetyl from their products

While hoping this is such their offices are closed but,
numerous e juice websites have contacted Mc' and confirmed they no longer use diacetyl in their extracts or any products..

Im very sensitive to diacetyl and have not had an allergic reaction --yet, lol...


http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...d-news-re-wiltons-clear-butter-flavoring.html

For safety sakes I will abide until confirmation from Mc Cormicks..

 

[Visus]

"Lorannes is so much stronger but not by much"
That statement botheres the hell out of me.
So contradicting

Sent from my SPH-L300 using Tapatalk 2

I use 8-9 drops more with mc cormick than with loranns
loranns basic line is definitely stronger but not by much
this is not considering their high powered super strength extract line.

Example: 100%vg mixes, pg results may difer
Banana loranns I darn near use it alone lol...@35% tastiest vape any lower in vg its washed out
Watermelon @25% 2%vanilla and a good long steep (so good)
Apple is horrible @any strength, taste like rubber tire, I even tried to make a rudimentary apple water same results rubber tire

 

[Visus]

BTW
Analogs in one cigarette have more diacetyl than in most non-butter flavors samples that in our digital use and would substantiate a worry...

Figure 2 shows a typical NPD gas chromatogram of the
ethyl acetate extract from the cigarette smoke extract derivatized with 1,2-phenylenediamine. The LOQ of each -
dicarbonyl compound were 9.2 pg for glyoxal, 13.0 pg for
methylglyoxal, and 17.0 pg for diacetyl in the present
study. The levels of glyoxal found in mainstream cigarette
smoke from regular size cigarettes ranged from 1.93 (A) to
4.78 g/cigarette
1
(F). The level of glyoxal in mainstream
cigarette smoke from king size cigarette O was 6.98 g/
cigarette
1
, which was greater than those in mainstream
cigarette smoke from regular size cigarettes. The level of
methylglyoxal in mainstream cigarette smoke from king
size cigarette O was 59.6 g/cigarette
1
, which was also
greater than those in regular size mainstream cigarette
smoke. The levels of diacetyl in mainstream cigarette
smoke from regular size cigarettes ranged from 307 (J) to
433 g/cigarette
1

 

[buffaloguy]

Confirmation or no confirmation. You couldnt get me to vape the stuff with a dead mans lungs. This from a company that was using a known hazardous substance in their product.

Back it up in your mind however you like. I cant trust it isnt there just cause they "say so". They used to say insulation didnt contain asbestos too, and it did. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me.

I just cant trust a company like that and I cannot support it for vaping. Flavoring companies that know their products are used for vaping were/have been proactive about this issue.

Leave the Mckormicks where it belongs. In the baking section of your cabinet.