MedCityNews: Public health leaders need to work with vaping advocates not against them

Status
Not open for further replies.

DrMA

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 26, 2013
2,989
9,887
Seattle area
I'm glad they published this piece. It was a comment on another article about the "AstroTurf" accusation towards CASAA and all vapers who tweeted their opposition to the Chicago indoor ban. Here's that thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...w-publication-accuses-casaa-astroturfing.html

That being said, I resent the title. vaping prohibitionists are NOT public health. They are tobacco control industry. And they do need to work with the real public health, who are vaping advocates, but, most importantly, they need to work with the public whose health they pretend to care so much about.
 
Last edited:

NorthOfAtlanta

Ultra Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 27, 2011
1,616
3,582
Canton, GA
I'm glad they published this piece. It was a comment on another article about the "AstroTurf" accusation towards CASAA and all vapers who tweeted their opposition to the Chicago indoor ban. Here's that thread: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...w-publication-accuses-casaa-astroturfing.html

That being said, I resent the title. Vaping prohibitionists are NOT public health. They are tobacco control industry. And they do need to work with the real public health, who are vaping advocates, but, most importantly, they need to work with the public whose health they pretend to care so much about.

While the bolded is true we need to stay on "public health" until those in public health who actually care about it call the grant sucking charlatans out for what they are, paid whores for BG, BP and BT.

Hi Stan.

:2c::D:vapor:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread