And I like what the says, if not the way he says it. But Dr. Nitzkin uses words far better.
Egs:
"The electronic cigarette shows great promise to save lives of those now smoking tobacco cigarettes." True and accurate and well-put, as Nitzkin would write it.
"The electronic cigarette could save hundreds of thousands of lives if smokers switched to using it." Not proven, thus not accurate or true, but exactly the way Siegel writes. Those words are an assumption that too many bloggers express as fact and thus turn off those who want truth and accuracy.
Nitzkin is very careful. Read him. Think about the way he words his thoughts. Siegel has shot from the hip, and while I think he's on target, I find his approach suspect for the masses. But, then, he isn't read by the masses. He's a blogger and doesn't write "articles", but opinion columns.