Get outta town! I won that fair and square! 
Someone must have gotten paid off. Whose payroll you on Wiz?
Lu
Someone must have gotten paid off. Whose payroll you on Wiz?
Lu
Member vs. Member
- Thread starter The Wiz
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Sorry Lu.....the people have spoken!The Wiz!........maybe we can have a special Moderator battle in the future!
The Wiz!........maybe we can have a special Moderator battle in the future!
Sorry Lu.....the people have spoken!
Yeh...a special edition! Just don't put me against SJ....I'd have to let him win
Lu
Wow.........that's a good one Lu..maybe the winner of the competition will HAVEto face SJ to become the New Admin!.......Nah ferggedit....Who'd want that Job..LOLThe Wiz!
The Wiz!
Don't worry TM there will be more "international" contestants in the next round!
The Wiz!
Oh gawd thanks for this thread Wiz, i needed the lulz after all the drama going around! And i miss your cute little wiz, the old avatar, i dunno why but i liked it a lot =)
And i'll cast a vote for Terra because, well, have you seen the guy's arms? And i bet he has a lot of cool bouncer moves to his arsenal!
And i'll cast a vote for Terra because, well, have you seen the guy's arms? And i bet he has a lot of cool bouncer moves to his arsenal!
Thanks Smo.......I thought the new avatar gave me a more sophisticated look!
......as for Terraphon.......He "bounced" the Walrus right out of the competition!The Wiz!
Rita...you did so well we're bringing you back for "The Battle of Baton Rouge" with Walrus!my lash wounds hurt a little but it was worth it
The Wiz!
Rita..It wasn't the "whip" she beat you with..LOLmy lash wounds hurt a little but it was worth it
The Wiz!
If you want me to work some magic on those lash wounds, let me know. PLEASE.my lash wounds hurt a little but it was worth it
Houdini........as Rita's promoter.....I can honestly say that is NOT going to happen!
The Wiz!
Yes, TB was off to Washington and filed this report:
DATELINE: WASHINGTON
By Tropical Bob
Washington, D.C. (AP) -- New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg disappeared from his office early today after receiving a hand-delivered letter from FDA acting commissioner Frank Torti that appeared to contain bad news.
E-smoker Tropical Bob, using years of experience at reading upside-down text reflections in a chrome-plated Zippo lighter, was able to copy the letter, which reads as follows:
Dear Sen. Lautenberg:
Have you lost it? Sounds like it. You want a ban on electronic cigarettes? Why? Why on earth do you want to ban something that doesn't impact the health of other people, promises to improve the health of users and ... oh, it's money not spent on Big Pharmaceutical products, money not paid in taxes on Big tobacco products. Okay, you have a point, but we're not a taxing agency, so that's not our consideration.
Here's what we've found in our studies of e-smoking:
A New Zealand clinical trial researcher has concluded they are safer than tobacco cigarettes and likely safe period. In more than a year of study, Dr. Murray Laugesen of Health New Zealand has yet to identify any health hazard in the vapor e-smokers inhale. Indeed, he has written that the germ-killing properties of the propylene glycol-based vapor might be healthful.
Although his studies are not yet concluded, it's significant that a lack of harm has been proven in everything he's tested to date. E-smokers now have some scientific assurance that the practice is not harmful, and might be beneficial.
Therefore, we've concluded that it might not be wise to ban these products at this time.
Since their invention in 2004, millions of e-smoking devices have been sold and used worldwide. In the past year, hundreds of thousands of smokers discovered the pleasure of e-smoking, where nicotine-laced vapor replaces tobacco smoke. With all that daily use, not one major injury incident has been reported. Now, one story is just an anecdote, but Internet forums devoted to e-cigs are filled with success stories, of improvements to health. There are hundreds of happy anecdotes on those forums of smokers no longer sucking in the known hazards found with tobacco smoking.
Surely those stories constitute a form of proof that e-smoking does not have any immediate negative consequences. Only the experience provided by years of use will prove there are no negative long-term effects. But there is no reason to think there will be. There is every reason to think e-smokers will live longer and healthier lives than smokers.
We have decided that until an incident raises a red flag, the FDA would do best to let e-smoking continue, with manufacturers responsible for health consequences. If a hazard is discovered, then the FDA would be obligated to regulate the practice. But until then, e-smoking is a promising option to reduce the health toll of cigarette smoking.
And you, sir, are a curmudgeon.
Sincerely,
The Honorable Frank M. Torti
Acting Commissioner
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20903
DATELINE: WASHINGTON
By Tropical Bob
Washington, D.C. (AP) -- New Jersey Sen. Frank Lautenberg disappeared from his office early today after receiving a hand-delivered letter from FDA acting commissioner Frank Torti that appeared to contain bad news.
E-smoker Tropical Bob, using years of experience at reading upside-down text reflections in a chrome-plated Zippo lighter, was able to copy the letter, which reads as follows:
Dear Sen. Lautenberg:
Have you lost it? Sounds like it. You want a ban on electronic cigarettes? Why? Why on earth do you want to ban something that doesn't impact the health of other people, promises to improve the health of users and ... oh, it's money not spent on Big Pharmaceutical products, money not paid in taxes on Big tobacco products. Okay, you have a point, but we're not a taxing agency, so that's not our consideration.
Here's what we've found in our studies of e-smoking:
A New Zealand clinical trial researcher has concluded they are safer than tobacco cigarettes and likely safe period. In more than a year of study, Dr. Murray Laugesen of Health New Zealand has yet to identify any health hazard in the vapor e-smokers inhale. Indeed, he has written that the germ-killing properties of the propylene glycol-based vapor might be healthful.
Although his studies are not yet concluded, it's significant that a lack of harm has been proven in everything he's tested to date. E-smokers now have some scientific assurance that the practice is not harmful, and might be beneficial.
Therefore, we've concluded that it might not be wise to ban these products at this time.
Since their invention in 2004, millions of e-smoking devices have been sold and used worldwide. In the past year, hundreds of thousands of smokers discovered the pleasure of e-smoking, where nicotine-laced vapor replaces tobacco smoke. With all that daily use, not one major injury incident has been reported. Now, one story is just an anecdote, but Internet forums devoted to e-cigs are filled with success stories, of improvements to health. There are hundreds of happy anecdotes on those forums of smokers no longer sucking in the known hazards found with tobacco smoking.
Surely those stories constitute a form of proof that e-smoking does not have any immediate negative consequences. Only the experience provided by years of use will prove there are no negative long-term effects. But there is no reason to think there will be. There is every reason to think e-smokers will live longer and healthier lives than smokers.
We have decided that until an incident raises a red flag, the FDA would do best to let e-smoking continue, with manufacturers responsible for health consequences. If a hazard is discovered, then the FDA would be obligated to regulate the practice. But until then, e-smoking is a promising option to reduce the health toll of cigarette smoking.
And you, sir, are a curmudgeon.
Sincerely,
The Honorable Frank M. Torti
Acting Commissioner
Food and Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20903
Start working out Ikenmoke!
Rolls up sleeves and preforms squat thrusts...Wait I'm fighten a woman, right?
- Status
Similar threads
