OK, I get some of what you are saying. Inner diameter is determined by what I use for making the wraps. Drill bit, screw driver, wrapping tool etc...I know I don't want to fool around with dual coil builds to start; so where do I go if 1.0 or less is the ohm I want to build to?The "592" is not degrees of temperature, but rather "miliiwatts per millimeter squared," a measure of power radiated from the surface of the coil. That is very hot. It might burn your juice or scorch your cotton (I use rayon where this is less of a problem, but still.) Do you see how handy that is? You don't have to actually build it to see what's gonna happenOne mistake you made is you didn't change the coil inner diameter. 1.3mm is tiny, 2 or 3 more normal. Such a coil would be very hard to wick. Here we go: vapor is made at the surface of the coil wire. You need an adequate amount of surface area to produce the vapor you want, but not too much so the juice burns out of the wick before it gets to the middle of the coil and causes the cotton to burn. As a rule of thumb, unless using Claptons or some other wild build, I think of 4-10 wraps is where I want to be. And one of the reasons I like to build duals is it's a lot easier to get reasonable size wire and coil loops down into the green zone (100-200 mW/mm^2) while staying subohm. Set steam engine up for 28ga, 3mm inner diameter, and 1.6 ohms for 8/7 wraps. At 20 watts you'll be 222, warmish but not bad. But at 15 watts, you'll be 166 and right in the sweet spot. However, you'll be down to 15 watts on a +ohm coil and not making cloud. Now set SE up for 28ga, .6 ohms, 3mm inner and dual coils for 5/6 wraps. At 20 watts you'll be 148, at 25 you'll be 185, and 15 will be a coolish 111, just barely in the green. See what we did? We just widened the power band from about 3 watts to about 10, all while staying in the green zone and providing a lot more selection for you to set watts and thus vapor production and temp, as well as battery life and juice consumption. Lol, I told you it was a handy gimmick
![]()
I don't expect you to give me every option there is, that would probably be a very long book for you to write