Need Help deciding ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

devauto

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 13, 2013
1,373
774
NoVA
It depends on what you are defining as better.

They are both exceptional. The main differences are an internal battery (MVP 2) and an external changeable battery (VTR). The ability to charge other devices (MVP 2). Size and weight, MVP 2 is smaller and lighter.

Otherwise, functionally they are pretty much identical for all major functions. I think it boils down to what you consider to be more important, and which one "looks" better to you. As always ... YMMV!

HTH
 

macaroni

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 5, 2013
1,297
7,859
Rockledge, Florida, USA
John, I can't comment on the MVP but I've got a VTR and couldn't be happier, it's solid, easy to use, performs flawlessly, and looks pretty cool in a transister radio/star trek phaser kind of way. The VTR comes with the iclear 30s tank (which I love), but the unit with tank/juice/battery is pretty hefty ... when I first got it I would have said heavy, but now that I'm used to it it's just hefty and well on it's way to simply solid. The reason I'd favor the VTR over the MVP is the ability to change to a backup battery when you need a recharge, rather than having to use a backup vaporizer while the MVP recharges. However, I don't think you can go wrong with either product.
 

ions

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 16, 2013
280
721
Baltimore, Maryland, USA
The thing I don't like about the VTR is not being able to use certain tanks or even a RBA with it. They basically do the same thing but the adapter for the VTR just looks ridiculous when you have to use it. The MVP is more lightweight and carry friendly in my eyes. The VTR is also a fingerprint magnet and is pretty hefty.
 

JQside

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 16, 2011
353
66
Canada
The VTR intrigue me because that's the style or setup I've been looking for, which is about stealth vaping - battery on one side and cartomizer on the other side. I was hoping they make an upgraded version of the gripper and I thought the VTR was the one. Most devices are getting ridiculously longer and longer. And the gripper solved it by putting the carto and battery side by side, which is what these manufacturers should be aiming at, imho. The 18350 is a small but resilient battery and it satisfies my vaping hobby.

I went to check the VTR on YouTube and it's not what I thought it was. And it's heavy according to the reviewer. So it's not for me. A nice modification of the gripper would be nice. It doesn't have to be VV.
 

dice57

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 1, 2013
4,960
3,734
68
Mount Vernon, Wa
VTR 6 volts 15 watts, MVP 5 volts 11 watts. The only reason I didn't get a VTR is because the recessed 510 connection is so narrow you are limited on the atomizers that one can use without using the extender adaptor. If the choice was between those two though, I'd get the VTR no question. Replaceable battery and 15 watts of power. Can't remember the last time I vaped at 11 watts.
 

Revelene

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 29, 2013
576
474
Kentucky, USA
I'd go with the VTR as it has a removable battery. The MVP V2 is good aswell but has an internal battery. Both are made by the same company and almost all of their devices use the similar chipsets. The VTR can hold an iClear 30 down the side of the device that cuts down on size... and the iClear 30 is one of the best performing clearomizers. The MVP does not have as much power output as the VTR. Either choice would be good but I despise anything with non-removable batteries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread