It absolutely is discrimination, based on appearance. And the propaganda campaign is essentially government-sponsored hate speech.
Yeah, I went to San Fran last year with my family for spring break and was shocked at the anti-vaping culture that was there. I am from a college town in texas and we have 7 or 8 vape shops here locally, out there my brother took me to the one, in San Francisco. LOL WHAT! My wife was asked by a waiter at a bar not use her e-cig on the outside patio with no one around. Blew my mind, all I could think was; Isn't weed legal here? By their reactions, and by their I mean, almost everyone, that me and my wife were public enemy #1. We aren't discourteous vapers either. Made me glad to live in my hippy town in texas. Keep up the good fight!
I'm watching the local news waiting for the weather, and what do I see? A report that the California Department of Public Health said e cigarettes pose a public health threat to (OMG the children) with no rebuttal or other opinion shown. I got riled. So I fired off a letter to the Department, KESQ the local TV station, as well as Gov Jerry Brown and my state assemblyman and state senator.
This is my very first post at ECF. I'm not even sure how this works. But I've had so much help here from you guys with my vaping "hobby" which I absolutely love. I just wanted to say THANKS. I use the Istick, MVP, Spinners, Vivi Nova Mini Tanks, and Kanger T2s. I started with Vuse, then Halo G6, then Halo Triton, then went to 510/ego threaded for the freedom. Anyway, here's my letter:
Dear KESQ,
I found your report on the California Department of Public Health's declaration that e cigarettes are a public health threat to be very one sided and not objective, in that the report did not include any spokesman to give any different perspective on vaping. Here is a copy of the letter I wrote to the Department and cc'd to the governor and my representatives in the state legislature.
1/28/2015
TO: California Department of Public Health
RE: E Cigarette Declaration of Threat
To Whom it May Concern,
I am writing in response to your declaration that e cigarettes are a health threat. This does not line up with the National Institutes of Health’s survey of studies of e cigarettes that I read. I am not opposed to some reasonable regulation of e cigarettes and liquids. I am opposed to the spread of misinformation.
I have been an inveterate smoker of tobacco cigarettes for 42 years. I began vaping and within a month I lost all interest in smoking. I stopped smoking by accident.
It is true that e cigarettes are not risk free, just hugely less risky than smoking, and studies of nicotine alone have shown the drug to be relatively benign although addictive (thus nicotine replacement therapy is considered very low risk).
If you excessively restrict my access to e cigarettes, I may have to return to smoking tobacco cigarettes.
I am asking you to moderate your department’s excessively negative, one-sided, uneducated, and alarmist position on the subject, as e cigarettes are providing a positive health benefit to a large group of former smokers.
Sincerely,
....
Best first post ever!!
odd how the general public needs a "witch hunt"
back in the late 1600's it was witch hunts
in the 1950's the "Reds" were the issue
In the 90's tobacco is the target
In the 2012 to present... Vaping is the new hunt
Choochoogranny, liking your post. Thanks for following the money. Makes the California Health Department look kinda crooked. Other post here said the head already resigned. Other thing that occurred to me with this hand wringing about the increase in kids using ecigs. I read in Forbes a positive vape article about that because teen tobacco rates are still falling. I think if a kid takes up vaping, nic or no, and doesn't start tobacco cigarettes, there is another decline in the teen smoking rate. A good thing. And Forbes pointed that out. Good response when someone complains about teens vaping. Well, they should not be doing anything, but they are not smoking. And vaping actually removes the desire to smoke, so the gateway thing is bunk. I'm hoping vaping has just gotten too big to stop by behind the curve politicians and big business. I'm sorry if its off topic or posted wrong. Still learning the site.Chris, California as well as other states sold bonds based upon the receipt of monies from the Master Tobacco Settlement Agreement. They wanted the money "up frront". These bonds are now tanking because smokers are quitting faster than was calculated in large part due to the success of vaping. The money each state gets from the MTSA is based on the amount of cigarettes sold in that state. So, states are getting reduced money from NOT selling cigs = reduced excise tax and reduced MTSA money. Now, they're going to run out of money to pay their bond debt if this vaping business keeps expanding.![]()
I never thought I'd live to see the day when a town in Texas out-hippys San Francisco.![]()
Don't forget about The Crusades and The Inquisition!
It's just the same as high school, "cool kids" against everyone else. Those who HAVE power have always enjoyed the hell out of making life miserable for those who don't. As if being powerless wasn't miserable enough!
Andria