Thank you for the information fellows, I had not thought of using the mouthpiece to further allow me to adjust the juice flow! A little bit of a learning curve but not bad at all.
NEW avs3 (UFS)
- Thread starter imeothanasis
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
-
- Tags
- ufs
- Status
One other general question I have is about using mineral oil instead of Vaseline, any issues there? I use it for threads and o rings where ever it may come in contact with juice. Every where else I use Nolalax. Thank you!
AVS vs UFS
After a day and one night of use, these are the differences:
- Plexiglass window, absent in AVS, useful to check the tank status
- AVS 901-UFS -> in AVS 901, the CR alredy varied inversely the flow of air and liquid, in fact with HV configuration and too much air and therefore less liquid, the atoms were burned, vice versa, with 3,7v NR configuration and too little air and liquid is flooded these.The use of 901 in UFS is now forecast, not comparable
- AVS-510-UFS -> in AVS, was a ring to predetermine the amount of liquid to flow into the atom, wasn't possible to adjust the setting when AVS was assembled and was easy to make a wrong initial adjustment, you may therefore have too fat or too thin fluid in the atom.In UFS, the liquid regulation has been printed outside (edit: placed outside), facilitating the adjustment of the liquid during the vaping experience, enabling you to refine the initial setting and also to change it according to the inevitable discharge of batteries. Profit also the ability to "close all" to vape any excess liquid in the collection tank
- Design -> AVS + GGTS had an overall look a bit "retro'", the combination GGTS UFS instead takes a more pleasant "industrial design"
- Approach -> UFS is definitely more "simple" to assemble and to use, while allowing more regulation, better for the inexperienced user
- Charge -> easier in the UFS, just open the lid, close both settings and upload
- Drain -> AVS sometimes losing a few drops, no leackage in UFS
- O-ring -> always been the AVS weakness, in UFS place is different, less essential and therefore imperfect maintenance and care, I think, can't brake the "system"
@ Imeothanasis did a great job, putting the reach of all a system that previously required a lot of sensitivity by the end user.the concept of regulation of air and liquid was already on AVS-510 but has now been refined and made user-friendly, the collector tank is more useful. I will not dwell on the usefulness dellla section plexiglass.
Excuse me for my bad English, Google translator can't do a better job
After a day and one night of use, these are the differences:
- Plexiglass window, absent in AVS, useful to check the tank status
- AVS 901-UFS -> in AVS 901, the CR alredy varied inversely the flow of air and liquid, in fact with HV configuration and too much air and therefore less liquid, the atoms were burned, vice versa, with 3,7v NR configuration and too little air and liquid is flooded these.The use of 901 in UFS is now forecast, not comparable
- AVS-510-UFS -> in AVS, was a ring to predetermine the amount of liquid to flow into the atom, wasn't possible to adjust the setting when AVS was assembled and was easy to make a wrong initial adjustment, you may therefore have too fat or too thin fluid in the atom.In UFS, the liquid regulation has been printed outside (edit: placed outside), facilitating the adjustment of the liquid during the vaping experience, enabling you to refine the initial setting and also to change it according to the inevitable discharge of batteries. Profit also the ability to "close all" to vape any excess liquid in the collection tank
- Design -> AVS + GGTS had an overall look a bit "retro'", the combination GGTS UFS instead takes a more pleasant "industrial design"
- Approach -> UFS is definitely more "simple" to assemble and to use, while allowing more regulation, better for the inexperienced user
- Charge -> easier in the UFS, just open the lid, close both settings and upload
- Drain -> AVS sometimes losing a few drops, no leackage in UFS
- O-ring -> always been the AVS weakness, in UFS place is different, less essential and therefore imperfect maintenance and care, I think, can't brake the "system"
@ Imeothanasis did a great job, putting the reach of all a system that previously required a lot of sensitivity by the end user.the concept of regulation of air and liquid was already on AVS-510 but has now been refined and made user-friendly, the collector tank is more useful. I will not dwell on the usefulness dellla section plexiglass.
Excuse me for my bad English, Google translator can't do a better job
Last edited:
pretty good translation i think! thanks for the rundown
one thing i find fun, because i am goofy, is to fire your atomizer and blow into the mouthpiece, you get vapor out of the cr holes, it's neat....lol
one thing i find fun, because i am goofy, is to fire your atomizer and blow into the mouthpiece, you get vapor out of the cr holes, it's neat....lol
yeah i dont see anything printed. i thought about maybe adding some sticky dots or something to the outside that i could line up....has to look good though...still pondering
I meant to say that the regulation was placed outside (Google translator isn't perfect)
I had one small problem with my UFS yesterday. I noticed the liquid control was closing farther than it has been, exposing the O-ring. The Atomizer started to unscrew. I screwed it on tightly, but somehow it unscred. Anyone have this happen yet? Dont think its a common thing.
In the Italian Forum we are experiencing a higher conductivity in UFS than AVS, it appears to you?
chill, this happened because you screw mouthpiece hard, that why I said to my videos to not do it like this. Screw the mouthpiece untill you see that is not moving when you vape. You screw hard the mouthpiece only when you want to totally stop liquid inside atomizer. So if you want to totally stop liquid then you close the liquid control and you screw the mouthpiece hard.
Lord, fantastic review, very detailed and an exellent comparison with AVS.!!
Lord, fantastic review, very detailed and an exellent comparison with AVS.!!
Ahh I see. I think I did have it tightened for overnight storage, and I did not loosen it before I opened the liquid control. I gotta remember that. Thanks.
yes, tight it for overnight storage and open it again at morning chill, thats a good plan. Before sleep I close the CR, the liquid control, the mouthpiece and the button.
Ok I have a bit of a werid question...ok ever tank style thing I have tried seems like u loose a lot of flavor and I end up getting rid of them or not using them. When using the avs does it taste like your dripping in the atomizer or is it like the tank cart where it seems to be all vapor little taste? I have searched for a feeder where I don't have to give up the rich flavor like dripping .... can anyone point me in the right direction
You're in the right spot. The AVS (and I assume the UFS...I'll have it tomorrow) has the richest flavor of any "feeder" I've ever tried. More rich than dripping, and I'm usually a dripper.
Ok I have been debating picking up ggts or slim to try this out and is like a investment and all the luck I have had with similar products have been real disappointing . Although I did enjoy bottom feed just not enough to stick with it. Maybe I will start off loading some mods and try to find everything but most places are always out of stock for one or the other of the GG line. Sounds interesting
- Status
Similar threads
