I think CBSA and Heath Canada are on very tenuous ground (e.g. very thin ice) and I'm having a problem understanding their motives. In the US I can understand that big
tobacco has lobbyists but is the same thing happening in Canada? And even if it is, wouldn't they be going after the legislators? I don’t understand why or how they are managing to influence Heath Canada into not respecting their own regulations - maybe someone can explain this to me?
By my interpretation, liquid nicotine used for
vaping is specifically exempted from schedule F which says “
Nicotine except: … (d) in a form to be administered orally by means of an inhalation device delivering 4 milligrams or less of nicotine per dosage unit;”. If you calculate someone vaping 36mg (the strongest e-liquid I have seen advertised – you’d need to be crazy to mix up a stronger potion) you definitely end up with less than 4 mg/dose.
I'm a very law abiding citizen, but I don’t see how CBSA/Heath Canada is respecting the law here. With that in mind, I took advantage of this lucrative offer of 1L of 100mg PG after reading a couple of reviews of the quality of this product from this supplier.
Maybe you've seen the show “Border Security” showing a bunch of CBSA Officers at the Vancouver mail centre casually checking packages with the luxury of all time in the world on their side. FedEx doesn't have the luxury of time and have their own (borrowed) CBSA Officers, paid a premium to rubber stamp everything they can as fast as they can to keep their service levels up to their standards. So I see from the tracking that it cleared, travelled another 1500 miles within Canada and will be out for delivery tomorrow.
I have broken no law.