PA Clean Indoor Air Act

Status
Not open for further replies.

sherid

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 25, 2008
2,266
493
USA
Write to the PA Department of Health through their website. Explain that e cigs do not burn, have no tobacco, etc. Look at the actual language of the law and show how e cigs do not violate any of it. I did that in Ohio, and they wrote back saying that e cigs do not violate the Ohio smoking ban, which incidentally is much stricter than PA's law.
 

dopple

Full Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 21, 2009
68
1
I'm reading over the Act, and it's fairly standard in terms of vocabulary and expected items.



You could always print a section to carry with you.


"Smoking" means the carrying by a person of a lighted cigar, cigarette, pipe or other lighted smoking device.

'other lighted smoking device'... the ignorant masses will say thats what we have since it lights up... unless i'm reading too far into this...
 

dopple

Full Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 21, 2009
68
1
Possible precedent from the office of the Washington State AG from this news story:
We checked with the Attorney General's Office and they say the electronic cigarettes are legal under the state's indoor smoking ban.​
It was discussed in this thread.


but remember... all states have their own set of laws.... something from Washington state has no worth in arguing a point in PA
 

ISAWHIM

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 15, 2009
195
1
49
Jacksonville, Florida
www.isawhim.com
Laws are just a guideline for how a judge should enforce society ethics.

EG, you can and will be charged with every possible thing which they believe you may be guilty of. The judge has to determine if you are actually guilty of any, or all of the accused crimes.

Unless the judge is having a sour day... "a lighted device", will hold no water. It is vague, and too general. This includes candles, pilot-lights, light-bulbs, night-lights, incense, oil-lamps, lighters, matches, televisions, etc... You would simply have your lawyer proclaim a mistrial, as the court/judge is actively participating in the same criminal activities, by holding a court in session with overhead lighting, which is a lighted device. You could also hand the judge a lighter, candle, match, flashlight, and ask him to use any one of those devices safely, in a socially and acceptable way, in turn, providing that being a lighted device does not constitute an injustification or breach of socially acceptable law.

...... make laws... judges have to rewrite all of them to make sense.

The term, "Lighted device", should be reworded to say, "Ignited material which has been proven to have medical repercussions to other persons within the enclosed proximity."

Key-words... "Ignited", "Proven", "Medical repercussions", "Other persons", "Enclosed proximity".

That covers all burning chemicals which are "Known", to cause harm, in a room or an entire building that is enclosed. While it ignores situations where YOU are the only individual, and situations where "Ignition of material is unknown or found to be safe, medically." (Stopping witch-hunters from sending people burning things which have no harmful byproducts, in allowable situations.)

I think that covers most issues. LOL.. No, I am not a lawyer... consult a lawyer before you apear before a judge, or participate in using "Lighted devices".
 
Last edited:

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
I disagree with you ISAWHIM. Almost all statutes and ordinances have definitional sections, where operative and key words are defined.

Even in the rare occurance that an ordinance or statute fails to have a critical word defined in a separate section, there will be legislative history that will make it clear.

I guarantee you that no one in the PA legal system would think a light bulb, an led, a flashlight, etc, would fall within the meaning of that quoted legislation.

As I said, lighted means ignited!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread