i did a little reading, it turns out that the AW protected batteries (black with silver label) use these cells, so not so new after all I guess
You can see those here: AW Protected 18650 3100 mAh
After doing some research on "mysterious" AW (no support, no web site, no contact info) uses 18650 Sanyo, or Panasonic cells and put AW label on them. That's all.
You can always get better deal by buying brand name with high current capabilities.
Am I wrong?
AW is Andrew Wong, you can contact him here: AW's LiIon Batteries Sales Thread *Part 12*
AW picks select panasonic cells to his particular specifications and then sells them. If you're familiar with computer components, this would be similar to memory suppliers like Corsair, G.skill, Mushkin, etc. They're all using chips by the same manufacturers, but they're selecting specific chips which meet their (much tighter) tolerances for performance. AW is essentially selling the best-of-the-best panasonic cells.
i think you missed the point.
Actually he's hit the nail right on the head. Quality control is handled by the manufacturer, not the reseller. If the same cells are used, the only difference is the wrapper.
If I have Panasonic 18650 IMR or Sanyo IMR cell, that should be the same as AW.
Not really and I think you are missing the point. The anology to computer components is a good one. When a company manufactures computer chips they have specifications in mind for those chips. However, when they actually make them, some meet the specs, some exceed the specs, some don't meet the specs but, can be reclassified to a lower spec and some are just junk.
When a company buys those chips for resale, they can say they only want the ones that exceed the spec by a specific amount. Ianim is saying that batteries have variances like computer chips. AW only buys the ones that exceed the spec by a specified amount. So, a battery that might be good enough to sell as a Sanyo or Panasonic may not be good enough to sell as an AW.
Did I get that right Ianim?
Not really and I think you are missing the point. The anology to computer components is a good one. When a company manufactures computer chips they have specifications in mind for those chips. However, when they actually make them, some meet the specs, some exceed the specs, some don't meet the specs but, can be reclassified to a lower spec and some are just junk.
When a company buys those chips for resale, they can say they only want the ones that exceed the spec by a specific amount. Ianim is saying that batteries have variances like computer chips. AW only buys the ones that exceed the spec by a specified amount. So, a battery that might be good enough to sell as a Sanyo or Panasonic may not be good enough to sell as an AW.
Did I get that right Ianim?
Is AW really getting the best cells, or ?
I do not think so. Info (test) below is from one of the most trusted battery reviewer.
AW clearly has the worst performing cells, comparing to the SAME cells Panasonic NCR18650A 3100mAh from other sources.
What I am trying to say is: AW has no ability to "choose" best of the best. Panasonic makes cells of the same quality (obviously very good quality), and if the cell doesn't pass PANASONIC (not AW) tests, it will NOT go out.
To maximize its profits in this case AW obviously picked very old cells, or what I suspect they are using cheaper version NCR18650 2900mah (not 3100mah). Test results are very close to 2900mAh performance.
From reviewer :
"These batteries are slightly lower in capacity, compare to some other batteries with the same cell, this might due to a different production batch or the cells being slightly older."
And this is link to the AW test:
Test of AW 18650 3100mAh (Black)
So think again.