Paranormal Activity

Status
Not open for further replies.

syntaxevasion

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
May 17, 2008
1,780
172
Jacksonville, FL
www.vapornine.com
“Paranormal Activity is one of the scariest movies of all-time.
You will be affected as it’s hard to ignore the imprint it leaves on your psyche.
Nightmares are guaranteed.”
- Brad Miska BLOODY-DISGUSTING


“SO SCARY!
Just when you thought it was safe to close your eyes…
GOOD LUCK GOING TO SLEEP!”
- Harry Knowles AINT IT COOL NEWS


“…GENUINELY HORRIFYING…”
- FILM THREAT

No thanks! :D
 

Kate51

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 27, 2009
3,031
22
78
Argyle Wi USA
Those are the kind of movies I always start watching when I'm home alone, and then can't turn it off, cause I'm too frightened to not know how it ends!!!!
"The Fly" comes to mind. Seemed harmless at first.
Love.Fear paranormal. Like one house that had a 'sick' piano in it. They had to totally destroy it an burn the pieces with an exorsist ceremony.
 

Ivisi

Unregistered Supplier
ECF Veteran
Apr 9, 2009
431
117
Orlando, FL
www.composed-chaos.com
Paranormal Activity is one of the scariest movies I've seen in 20 years, easily, and there's not one bit of 'gore' in it.

Lately, horror movies equate blood and gore with being scary. They've abandoned the notion that to be truly scary, there has to be a sense of unknown, that the scare comes from the unexpected. Too many are completely predictable.

I was at the premiere of The Blair Witch Project. Not only was it a great premise, the first entry in the 'found footage' genre, but it did one thing very well: it used your mind against you to build up the fear and the scares. You didn't have to see anything to be frightened by the movie, because your mind filled in the blanks for you.

There've been a lot of 'found footage' movies since then, most notably Cloverfield. But Paranormal Activity is the first that really took what Blair Witch started and expanded on it the most effectively I've seen yet.

Made on a 15,000 dollar budget, Spielberg actually picked it up, liked the premise, and had planned on remaking it with a larger budget. (Ironically, after he screened the DVD at his home, he would no longer keep the DVD in his house, it scared him so bad.) But when they screened it for a team of writers at Dreamworks, then later to a test audience, they realized that they didn't have to do anything to the film, that it was perfect the way it was, so they came up with this Internet/college crowd/word-of-mouth marketing scheme, with staged releases. It's also the highest per-screen gross of any movie out at this time.

4 actors, 1 location, 1 DV camcorder, and all old-school scare effects save for 1 slightly-longer-than 2 second CGI effect at the end, and it has become one of my top five fave horror flicks ever.
 

KermieD

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 5, 2009
77
0
57
Oshkosh, WI
I know I'm late to the party here, but I want to echo the sentiments above, and I hope some of the others got to see it after it was more widely released.

FYI, the movie *was* changed after the initial release to the film festival circuit in 2007. Footage was added of the couple to make the audience feel more attached to them, the sequence of the haunting events was changed to provide more of a sense of escalation, and the daylight scenes were added to sort of "ramp up" the tension. Finally, the ending was changed drastically (much for the better IMO).
 

Bandit

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 17, 2009
1,319
25
In your bushes, watching you undress
I thought it was kinda lame. Not scary in the slightest. Only moderately creepy.

I cannot for the life of me imagine how anyone was scared to tears over this thing as we hear in all the reviews. There are tons of movies out there that are way more intense and way more scary. This was about a 5 on the scare-scale IMO.

The acting was very well done though, they seemed very natural as if you really were watching home video footage.

It needed to deliver a lot more. And I don't mean that it needed in your face graphic horror.. it just needed to deliver more of what they were trying to accomplish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread