About the monopoly law, lets dig deeper, please!
Thanks,
Rob
I have been researching this for awhile now and the idea is extremely rough... however... filing with the FTC, we would have to prove that someone else did something to us. And I don't think paypal would fit into this.
It would have to be someone who sells the same type of product as us... nicotine. So... we would have two places to look and we would have to prove to the FTC that this "competitor" was doing something to keep us unfairly out of the market. Now, I haven't been able to find anything that notes an industry against an industry... companies against each other for sure... but I also live in the "fantasy" land that the e-cig is going to change up quite a bit and new rules and roads will be paved. So anything is possible.
An example: if a crafty tobacco company could come up with the right proof to prove that PM used Congress to pass legislation to keep their competitors out of the market, then that would merit looking into by the FTC.
It's all very interesting and from what I have read, and I am not a lawyer, we are not quite there yet. If the FDA keeps going the route they are, and the judge finds for SE and/or nJoy, we are one step closer to it for sure.
But this brings up another question: Could you lodge a complaint with the FTC against the FDA? We all know the FDA gets much of its funding from pharma and now they will get quite a bit from tobacco... so if they make it impossible for the ecig industry to submit and apply, then would that be grounds for complaint? The fact that they are not allowing a new industry to take it's place, rightfully so in the market through proper approval?
One thing is for certain, we have to wait to do anything for when the Judge rules. At that point, several paths will be laid out for us and from there... we will be able to tell which is the best route to go.
For now, we will do what we have done for the last two years and adapt. Paypal is not the end of this industry.