Of course if one uses the same resistance atty/carto/clearo all the time this makes watts unnecessary. I have a variable wattage device, its called my finger and I use it to buy 100 pre-punched cartos at the same resistance once a year.Couldnt be simpler.
All VW devices also have VV.WHY? Because VV is more accurate. Watts get you in range but adjusts in .5 watts increments while VV adjusts in .1 volt increments. Watts will get you close but VV will get you closer.
Actually all VW devices do not have VV. The Vamo V3 will not have VV. The Darwin does not have VV. My strong guess from what I have read is that there will be many more VW only model PV's in the near future.
For what I will call the "purest" or "hobbist" or "fiddler", I can see the attraction of VV more than VW. Plus, currently in the growth of vaping, VV is more common. But for the "masses", it's pretty obvious why they would prefer VW over VV. Not stating one is better than the other, just that one is more "set & forget" than the other.
I think an apt comparison is in the auto industry. There are those who like to use "cruise control" on the highway and those who want to maintain their speed themselves and make "slight" adjustments on their own. When crusie control first came out, many were wary of it. Now the vast majority use it all the time.
The easier it becomes to get a "good" vaping experience in a closer to "automatic" formate, the greater chance that more people will convert to vaping. There will always be options for the fiddler but I can see how VW is a logical step in the evolution of vaping.
It really all comes down to how much do you want to play with your device? If I blindfold you and give you the same setup at 3.9v, 8watts(4v), and 4.1v your not gonna tell a difference. Now lets take the same devices at the same settings and give you three different resistance tanks,9 hits in all. The 3 hits at 8watts will be the same and the other 6 will vary. One way is no better than the other they are just different in how you use them. I call vw the Ronco setting because " you just set it and forget it!"
Neither of the PV's you mentioned are currently on the market so I'll stand by that statement.
I understand what your saying and where youre coming from with this but I still say VW appeals to those who make things (sometimes overly) complicated for their themselves and create the need for a device to make everything simpler.
Im fortunate that all of my juices taste best at 5.2 volts on a 3.0ohm carto. I change tanks out when I get bored with a flavor but other than that I dont vary much myself. I found what works for me a long time ago and I have no need to have one juice in an RBA at 1.1 ohms ....another in a clearo with 2.2 ohms, the third , fourth and fifth in a Vivi Nova at 3ohms etc etc etc.
Seems awfully complicated for something that serves as a replacement for a cigarette, which was the simplest thing in the world to use.
Vaping itself is really confusing for those just starting out....so many juices and different delivery devices to try. I can see where VW would be appealing from that perspective but cant help but wonder if it doesnt hurt in the long run by not encouraging people to keep it simple to begin with.
You might not be able to taste the difference on a Vamo but on my Provari I CAN taste the difference between 3.9v, 4.0v and 4.1vs. This has to do with PWM and the Vamo not using a line filter to keep the output constant. The Vamo arrives at an average wattage with a pretty considerable range in dips and spikes, thats where the " rattlesnake" comes from. Im not knocking your device, for the money its great but it isnt as accurate as a Provari by any stretch of the imagination.
Actually, I think you are making my point for me but coming to the wrong conclusion. VW, being more "set & forget" does make vaping less complicated and easier. People being people, are influenced to try new options. (think cell phones) With VW, when you want to try that "next new atty/carto", you don't even have to think about the resistence. Again, easier, simpler and less to configure or consider.
And then there is the factor that as you use an atty/carto, etc, the resistence changes just through use. VW adjusts for that. VV does not.
Lol were gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. I dont think Im coming to the wrong conclusion at all.
If youre a complicated person VW might well be the best choice for you.
If youre a jeans and t-shirt kinda guy and only shop when you need something then VV is probably the best option for you.
I think your comments could confuse a new person in that they may not see any difference in how VV & VW function and that it's just a difference of opinion.
1. VV does NOT adjust to the change in the resistence of the atty/carto one is using.
2. VW does automatically adjust to the change in the resistence of the atty/carto one is using.
So the way they function is different. One person may perfer one form of vaping over the other, which is fine. But they are not the same.
What the hell? I never said VW is better than VV. Lol sure you didnt get that turned around in your head?
Really, lol??? Not needing to make adjustments is more complicated that needing to making adjustments??? I guess we live in different universes, lol.
No one here is right, no one here is wrong (other than a couple of people who are saying, "I'm right and everyone else is wrong"). It's all personal preference. Whatever works for you is best (for you). As usual, this is a completely silly argument.
I sometimes wonder if a mech with a kick is better... Since you have to open the whole thing to change the wattage of the kick, what is better? A VW or a mod with a kick?