Mindfield,
Yea they are very picky, As for your advice. I asked for a mentor to help me with this before it posted it. I had the hand warmer, two of their regulars told me to brighten it up to where it is now. and one mentioned the hand thing and had me flip it to where it is now because they said It isn't suppose to be the same person as the one with the flower. I think I will post the stupidest thing I can come up with and see how it does.
Heh -- that's probably not a bad idea.

Although in general voters seem to get the votes right in a coarser granularity, but when it comes to the top ranked chops, it starts coming down to personal taste and ephemeral things like how you approached the image (humour, cuteness, etc.) and even the choice of source images (where the source wasn't pre-selected).
As for the advice ... I dunno. Maybe the brightness and contrast comes down to personal taste but for me it just seems to pop a little too much, being the brightest thing in the scene. Again though, I've never won even an amateur contest (a few 2nds and thirds were my best) so take that advice for what it's worth. The reflection though I can't bring myself to agree with. Concave lenses would create a reverse, slightly pinched reflection that would make the image make
sense, but that's a convex lens (the reflection drops off on the right side of the lens, indicating it's reflecting the right sidewall of the gunsight), so reflections would be a little fish-eyed and properly reflected -- like a mirror that's been pushed out a bit from behind.
I hope your mentor(s)/regulars didn't have a stake in that contest.
I can't believe the detail that you noticed mindfield. wow. (i didn't even SEE the reflection in the gunsight)
When it comes to Worth1000 I'm used to looking at finer details. To the entrants and voters there, every little detail could mean gaining or losing a rank, so you kind of learn to get ridiculously critical -- both of your own and other people's.