now be nice, pk
I was, I was just busy at the moment. and the last page explainded a lot!
Pre veteran thread (2011)
- Thread starter whiskey
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
I was, I was just busy at the moment. and the last page explainded a lot!
What?,, that wasn't mean..... (was it?)
Not at all. see my post above.
nope - not mean, lol ..... but he didn't have to keep you in suspense
Actually, in the prior post I told him Cozzicon's status.
Last edited:
,,,,,,,,,,,,,
What you did to PK, Tib. There were a few posts in between when I wrote it and when I posted it. I should have quoted you, but I'm an instigator, too.
What you did to PK, Tib. There were a few posts in between when I wrote it and when I posted it. I should have quoted you, but I'm an instigator, too.
where is it written in the rules that i can't pick on pk?
That would be rule number 5083, section 184, subsection 17F. It's in volume 14 of the ECF rule book.
The rule specifically states that undercover instigators can not pick on PKZ. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself.
The rule specifically states that undercover instigators can not pick on PKZ. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself.
where is it written in the rules that i can't pick on pk?
Ummmm.......nowhere.
heh heh
That would be rule number 5083, section 184, subsection 17F. It's in volume 14 of the ECF rule book.
The rule specifically states that undercover instigators can not pick on PKZ. If you don't believe me, look it up yourself.
Jerry, you know that subsection was overturned in rule number 5083, section 184, subsection 23.2g
- Status
Similar threads
