Question about Cisco 306 attys

[mlinky]

OK, I have been using the Cisco 1.5 ohm 306's as my standard atty for months now, and I LOVE them I also enjoy the Cisco 2.0 ohm 510's

I am thinking about getting some Cisco 306's in 1.8 ohm or 2.0 ohm for some of my sweeter juices. My question is for those of you that have used the 1.5's and the other Cisco LR 306's, are there any differences that you can tell with draw and performance (other than the difference in resistance)?

 

[Rhapsodies Fire]

I didn't notice a difference in the draw...only the heat/flavor. But honestly, I haven't used the 1.5 Cisco's in such a long time now, that my memory might not be accurate. It might be my imagination, but the 1.5s seemed to use batteries more quickly.

 

[mlinky]

I didn't notice a difference in the draw...only the heat/flavor. But honestly, I haven't used the 1.5 Cisco's in such a long time now, that my memory might not be accurate. It might be my imagination, but the 1.5s seemed to use batteries more quickly.

That would make sense because the lower the resistance, the more power you are drawing from the battery.

 

[nocturn4l3030]

I didn't notice a difference in the draw...only the heat/flavor. But honestly, I haven't used the 1.5 Cisco's in such a long time now, that my memory might not be accurate. It might be my imagination, but the 1.5s seemed to use batteries more quickly.

i feel the same way. i have a couple of each, 1.5, 1.8, and 2.0. the draw is definitely the same, just a flavor difference.

but then again, there are some days a juice tastes way better in a 2.0, and i feel like the 1.5 is burning it.. then the next day i'll try it in the 1.5 and think, "this tastes good!".. ahha

 

[want to quit]

I just got my first 2.0 in after using the 1.5 for a while and really I cannot see ANY difference AT ALL besides a small flavor difference.

 

[dopeh]

I find them kinda the same (306) - they vary enough within spec that the slightly higher spec isn't too noticeable. I do find the 1.5 tend to use more juice and power for not much gain if any. I now use the 2Ω only, and 1.8Ω for the 510.

 

[mlinky]

Thanks for all of the info. This is exactly what I needed to know. You all are great!

 

[unsure]

With tobacco flavor I taste no difference but juice seems to go faster with 1.5Ωs.

 

[Torqueguy]

OK, I have been using the Cisco 1.5 ohm 306's as my standard atty for months now, and I LOVE them I also enjoy the Cisco 2.0 ohm 510's

I am thinking about getting some Cisco 306's in 1.8 ohm or 2.0 ohm for some of my sweeter juices. My question is for those of you that have used the 1.5's and the other Cisco LR 306's, are there any differences that you can tell with draw and performance (other than the difference in resistance)?

I've been using the 1.8 ohms more as I've switched over to a lighter, more pv juice. iKV gold to be specific. I leave the 1.5's for the sticky, after dinner juices like BWB 555 which is heaven at 1.5 ohms and fresh batts.

Great avatar. Every time I see your sprawled out kitten, I get to be a little kid for a brief moment again. Thanks

 

[mlinky]

With tobacco flavor I taste no difference but juice seems to go faster with 1.5Ωs.

No flavor difference? That is interesting.

 

[mlinky]

I've been using the 1.8 ohms more as I've switched over to a lighter, more pv juice. iKV gold to be specific. I leave the 1.5's for the sticky, after dinner juices like BWB 555 which is heaven at 1.5 ohms and fresh batts.

Great avatar. Every time I see your sprawled out kitten, I get to be a little kid for a brief moment again. Thanks

LOL, thanks!

 

[Big Hitter]

I noticed that I never got dry hits with a 2Ω 306 and with the 1.5Ω I was worthless at keeping them wet enough