Questions about cartomizer/clearomizer/glassomizer
- Thread starter viperyuan
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Don't feel bad.
I remember when Cartomizers were New.
LOL
Are all cartomizer coils vertical? And does cartomizer invented earlier than clearo/glasso?
To an extent yes. Honestly, I'd just stick with whatnis working. If once you feel experienced enough to tinker and venture out you still have questions feel free to ask. You haven't even touched on BC, BDC, GENI to name a few.
But yes in essence the main physical difference is appearance. But performance is by far the most notable difference. Give a Clearo a good rip, then try the same on a Carto, you'll understand the difference then lol.
But yes in essence the main physical difference is appearance. But performance is by far the most notable difference. Give a Clearo a good rip, then try the same on a Carto, you'll understand the difference then lol.
In 2010, when i started vaping, there was a flavor cartridge which held juice. You screwed the Atomizer to it. Two seperate pieces.
In 2011 the two pieces were melded together and called a cartomizer. Soon shorted to Carto.
There is no filiment feeding anything.
A batting that you juiced up, a piece of quilted paper surrounded the coil/ wick assembly.
34awg/silica.
Silica has a high melt temp far exceeding the surrounding batting, hense the quilted material acting as a heat shield when moist.
I took apart dozens of these trying to repair fried coils.
No, atomizers should not be clasified as cartos.
Confusion exists because of Carto Tanks. A last ditch effort to prolong the carto.
BE VERY HAPPY with todays technology.
In 2011 the two pieces were melded together and called a cartomizer. Soon shorted to Carto.
There is no filiment feeding anything.
A batting that you juiced up, a piece of quilted paper surrounded the coil/ wick assembly.
34awg/silica.
Silica has a high melt temp far exceeding the surrounding batting, hense the quilted material acting as a heat shield when moist.
I took apart dozens of these trying to repair fried coils.
No, atomizers should not be clasified as cartos.
Confusion exists because of Carto Tanks. A last ditch effort to prolong the carto.
BE VERY HAPPY with todays technology.
First came the 2 Piece Cartridge and Atomizer.
Then came Cartomizers.
Then came something called the E2.
Then came the CE2. Regarded as The 1st Clearomizer.
Yes, more I learn about e-cig and atomizer, I really think the categories of atomizer are not very reasonable.
Confusion exists because of Carto Tanks. A last ditch effort to prolong the carto.
I notice the sentence above, so I get the conclusion the a carto-tank equals a clearo. just need to be confirmed by veterans like you. LOL
A carto-tank equals a clearo? It really looks the same.
No.
A Carto-Tank is a Tank that excepts a Cartomizer. And the Cartomizer that goes into a Carto-Tank has a Hole in the side of it so the e-Liquid can go from the Tank to the inside of the Cartomizer.
A Clearo is a Self Contained Atomizer and Tank combined. And there is Nothing that can be Removed or Replaced per say.
The essentials are basically Rebuildable Dripping Atomizer and Rebuildable Tank Atomizer. Most everything is within these two. Granted if you cant/won't make your own coils you can get many tanks with prebuilt heads containing the wick and coil. Rebuilding is much cheaper though.
And the Industry grew using Shortened Slang Terms that people on Forums like this used.
When I started, what you put an Atty on was called an e-Cigarette. And if you came up with a Modification, or you Build something from scratch, that was called a "Mod".
Then people started to call an e-Cigarette a "PV" for Personal Vaporizer.
Then they called them "APV's"
Now, everything is called a Mod.
LOL
Why? OMG
The carto-tank acts like a reservoir in the glasso.
And the cartomizer acts like the atomizer inside the glasso.
I am aware of the punched holes in the cartimizer, which enable the e-juice to be absorbed into it. However, the glassomizer must have similar holes which have the same oil absorption function.
Then why can't I have the conclusion ‘A carto-tank + a cartomizer=a clearomizer?’ ?
Why? OMG
The carto-tank acts like a reservoir in the glasso.
And the cartomizer acts like the atomizer inside the glasso.
I am aware of the punched holes in the cartimizer, which enable the e-juice to be absorbed into it. However, the glassomizer must have similar holes which have the same oil absorption function.
Then why can't I have the conclusion ‘A carto-tank + a cartomizer=a clearomizer?’ ?
Because if it contains a Cartomizer, Nobody calls it a Clearomizer.
That's what made a Clearomizer Different. It didn't use a Cartomizer.
- Status
Similar threads
