Riverside County, Calif Vaping Ban possible

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fiamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 9, 2012
1,438
1,380
So Calif
RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Ban is currently meant for county buildings.... but these things tend to mushroom outwards.

And here we go again.

County Supervisor John Benoit said he supports adding e-cigarettes to the no-smoking policy. “Our human resources agency is obviously responding to a concern,” said Benoit, a non-smoker.

Riverside county residents might want to light up the phones of the county supervisors. Their meeting starts at 9 am 28 August. Not much time.
 
Last edited:

Fiamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 9, 2012
1,438
1,380
So Calif
Contact information for the Board of Supervisors of Riverside County, Calif.

Riverside County Supervisors

Bob Buster, 1st District

email: district1@rcbos.org

Phone Riverside Office 951 955 1010
Fax Riverside Office 951 955 1019

Phone Wildomar Office 951 609 1326
Fax Wildomar 951 609 1403
,,,,,

John F Tavaglione 2nd District

email: district2@rcbos.org

Phone Riverside Office 954 955 1020
Fax Riverside Office 951 955 2362

,,,,,

Jeff Stone 3rd District

email: district3@rcbos.org

Phone Riverside 951 955 1030
Phone French Valley 951 698 7326
Phone Hemet 951 791 3490

No fax numbers listed

.....

John J Benoit 4th District

email: district4@rcbos.org

Phone Riverside 951 955 1040
Fax Riverside 951 955 2194

Phone Palm Desert 760 863 8211
Fax Palm Desert 760 863 8905

Phone Blythe 760 921 5070
Fax Blythe 760 921 5085

......

Marion Ashley 5th District

email: district5@rcbos.org

Phone Riverside 951 955 1050
Phone Moreno Valley 951 486 5810
Phone Perris 954 210 1300

No fax numbers listed

Call them, email them, fax them on Monday. They meet to vote on Tuesday morning at 9 am 28 August.
 

Fiamma

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 9, 2012
1,438
1,380
So Calif
The Riverside County ban on vaping in county buildings passed this morning.

Tweeted by J. Horseman: Benoit, Tavaglione questioned need for ban. But HR director and county safety officer said it was needed b/c of possible health risks.

Buster, Ashley: Need to err on side of caution and protect public from potentially harmful effects of vaping exhaust.

Wondering now if someone got a CDC grant in Riverside to feed the HR and county safety office this claptrap.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
68
Many and perhaps most of the local and state proposals to ban/restrict e-cigarette use since 2010 appear have been unlawfully lobbied for by CDC grant recipients.

Had I/we known about this sooner, I/we could have exposed and criticized these illegal lobbying activities to local and state legisltors when they were considering the proposed legislation (which could have derailed many more of them).
 
Last edited:

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
68
Riverside County (CA) Supervisors ban e-cigarette use in county owned buildings due to false fear mongering allegations by several county department heads.
Ban Imposed On Electronic Cigarettes - Lake Elsinore-Wildomar, CA Patch

I couldn't find any mention of the e-cigarette use ban in the 20 page agenda packet for yesterday's meeting.
Meeting Portal - Riverside County, California

I couldn't even find contact information for the county supervisors or the county department heads who urged the supervisors to ban e-cig use on the county's website.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
They can put e-cigs into any cit ordinance that they want. It's not going to stop me from using my e-cig when and where I want.

All you have to do is follow the money here. This all goes back to big tobacco having a money strangle hold on the FDA and CDC.

If you really do follow the money, you'll discover that the source of FDA's funding these days is the pharmaceutical industry. You will find out that the non-profit organizations that have that have been screaming at the FDA to ban e-cigarettes receive grants and donations from the pharmaceutical industry--especially from the companies that make those not-very-effective FDA-approved smoking cessation products. (GlaxoSmithKline, J&J, and Pfizer).

If you should ever show up at a public hearing regarding e-cigarettes, you'll find that the paid lobbyists in attendance testifying the e-cigarettes cause cancer and contain antifreeze work for these aforementioned non-profit organizations (American Lung Association, American Heart Association, and American Cancer Society), and therefore these lobbyists work indirectly for the pharmaceutical industry.

Even on the FDA's Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, there are 3 members from the tobacco industry (one from a big tobacco company, one representing tobacco growers, and one representing the supporting industries such as rolling papers. None of these three members has a vote.

The model legislation that changes the definition of smoking to include e-cigarettes is published on the American's for Non-smokers's Rights. http://www.no-smoke.org/pdf/modelordinance.pdf You'll find all the familiar lies about e-cigarettes in that document.

The ALA, ACS, and AHA joined with Campaign for Tobacco-free Kids in position statements recommending that all sales of e-cigarettes be banned, and when that didn't work, they have been pushing to have indoor use of e-cigarettes banned.

http://www.ttac.org/tcn/tfp/2010/may-2010/pdfs/Policy_Guidance_E-Cigarettes.pdf
http://www.naccho.org/advocacy/positions/upload/12-04-e-Cigarettes.pdf

Recently, one of the big tobacco companies, Lorillard, bought up Blu E-cigs; and other tobacco companies have announced that they will be entering the market as well. They followed the money and realize that as the use of regular cigarettes goes down, they can make up their losses by selling low-risk alternatives to smoking.

You need to read through some of the past postings in this News area--especially the Media and General News to learn what these folks have been up to, and what CASAA has been fighting since its inception.

CASAA - The Consumer Advocates for Smoke-free Alternatives Association
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread