Secondhand Exposure to Vapors From Electronic Cigarettes

[Jman8]

Right, so if you breath in 3.6% nicotine, you are exhaling 2.7% nicotine, assuming vapor molecules are as small as oxygen molecules, which they aren't.

Okay, then if you breathe in 2.7% nicotine from secondhand vapor, you exhale 2.1% nicotine from that same vapor.

IOW, if not absorbed from first hand vapor all that much, then how can we, via science, conclude more absorption via SHV?

And if most of it is absorbed via first hand vapor, then there would be arguably barely any available for SHV.

SHV also must take into account that when exhaled, it is nearly always the case that the exhaled mist would be greatly dispersed in the air in a matter of seconds.

 

[zoiDman]

BTW - If Anyone has not seen the Alert at the Top of EVERY ECF Page, they should go read this Thread...

http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...hipment-e-cigarettes-anyone-california-2.html

 

[LDS714]

To me, It all get's back to that Why is there Not more Excepted Information and Peer Reviewed Studies regarding e-Cigarettes/e-liquid.

Most positive studies ARE 'Excepted' by the media and especially by the folks on the Chicago city council...

 

[zoiDman]

Most positive studies ARE 'Excepted' by the media and especially by the folks on the Chicago city council...

There are Many Studies that I see the Media Using.

Unfortunately, Most of them are Based on a lot of "Junk Science". And are Skewed to the Agenda that is being Pushed by One Individual at the University of California at San Franscico. And the Other from the University of California at Riverside

 

[Stosh]

Since everyone is discussing science and how requlation needs to be based on good science, allow me to present....
6 Shocking Studies That Prove Science Is Totally Broken | Cracked.com

 

[zoiDman]

Since everyone is discussing science and how requlation needs to be based on good science, allow me to present....
6 Shocking Studies That Prove Science Is Totally Broken | Cracked.com

I think what is Sad about Today's Science is it is Becoming More and More a Vehicle to Promote Agendas that it is to Determine Fact.

There was a time when Mis-Representing Facts using science was consider the Most Egregious act a Researcher could do.

Today the that just Isn't the case. A Lot of it is Science anymore. It's more Hype and Propaganda using something that Looks like Science.

 

[Vocalek]

Good comments from the reviewers - nice (if unsurprising ) to see Dr. F taking an interest

I especially liked Dr. Hajek's take on the importance of the study:

Level of interest:An article of outstanding merit and interest in its field

http://www.biomedcentral.com/imedia/1761723359113278_comment.pdf

 

[sonicdsl]

Keep it level in here please, and stay on topic.

If you need to debate, take it Outside.

 

[zoiDman]

Keep it level in here please, and stay on topic.

If you need to debate, take it Outside.

Sorry sonicdsl.