And what Truth am I supposed to be Spreading?
Perhaps you can provide some Links to Studies showing that Nicotine use in Adolescent is Without Harm?
Then maybe we would have something to Spread.
You are the one asking for a legal restriction of activity, how about you provide some evidence that nicotine use in adolescence causes harm. NRT is approved for children as young as 12, so I'm sure some tests have been done, but that's not really the point now is it?
You FEEL it is bad, and therefore it should be restricted. Until you provide something other than a gut feeling, I don't really have anything more to say to you. I did actually provide a link to an article that cites a number of studies providing potential benefits of nicotine, and refuting the addictiveness of nicotine, I'll leave it to you to follow the citations. Or you can just stick with your gut.
Perhaps you(or I) should start a new poll:
Given the scientific evidence to date that nicotine is not addictive and is probably somewhat beneficial, that vaping is not harmful, and that vaping does not lead to tobacco use, do you think it is right to enforce an arbitrary age limit on the purchase of e-liquid that contains nicotine? *Please read through the thread and links provided within prior to voting.
Yes, I believe the government should parent where I cannot.
No, if I don't want my children vaping I will do my job as a parent and talk to them about it.
I'm still undecided.