Sub ohm dangerous?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,627
1
84,757
So-Cal
There is a gigantic difference between 0.9 and 0.25 even tho' they are both sub ohm (about a 40 watt difference @4v). Minute differences in resistance make huge differences in wattage anytime you go below 1 ohm.

The thought process of 'how low can I go before there is a problem' only assures us that there will be a problem.

Yeah... That is True.
 

NicoHolic

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 13, 2013
2,034
4,435
USA
The thought process of 'how low can I go before there is a problem' only assures us that there will be a problem.

That process is like applying torque to a fastener by tightening it 'til it strips, then backing off a 1/4 turn... yes, that assures a problem.

Using the appropriate information, tools, and principles ensures there won't be a problem.
 

Vapo Marx

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 20, 2013
799
1,134
New York
I'll put it this way.

I've been messing with electrical and electronic gadgets since I was five. I've been doing it professionally since the '80s. I used to make a living by repairing, designing, modifying and building devices that ran off high voltages at currents that could kill you if you made a false move. I will not mess with sub-ohm vaping.

A shorted battery can become a powerful bomb. Impressing other vapers isn't worth the risk, IMO.
 

AttyPops

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 8, 2010
8,708
134,420
Hc Svnt Dracones - USA EST
The other thing that bothers me about this trend is that it's a bit dualistic. Most people use e-cigs as a harm-reduction device. The super-sub-ohm huge cloud thing is courting danger from a physical harm standpoint (heat and huge density of VG/PG in lungs).

CASAA just released a good-news study with normal levels of vapor production. That was cool. But nobody...NOBODY...is studying these huge clouds of thick vapor yet. They look at normal exposure levels, not these.

So I'm not sure all sub-ohm is created equal either. But the trend to go lower with more coils is where it would tend to tip the scales if it does at all.

Food for thought for those chasing clouds.
 
Last edited:

Vapo Marx

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 20, 2013
799
1,134
New York
Someone should make a handy-dandy container that holds two PVs side-by-side, gangs the switches and directs the output into a single mouthpiece. There ya go: gigantic clouds of vapor at little risk (except to your wallet).

Another idea: a head and double-pole switch assembly that uses a three-terminal connection (for two atomizer coils of reasonable resistance, contained in the same head and having separate "+" connections and a common "-") and two side-by-side batteries, each powering its own atomizer.
 
Last edited:

tj99959

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
  • Aug 13, 2011
    15,116
    39,600
    utah
    Someone should make a handy-dandy container that holds two PVs side-by-side, gangs the switches and directs the output into a single mouthpiece. There ya go: gigantic clouds of vapor at little risk (except to your wallet).

    Another idea: a head and double-pole switch assembly that uses a three-terminal connection (for two atomizer coils of reasonable resistance, contained in the same head and having separate "+" connections and a common "-") and two side-by-side batteries, each powering its own atomizer.


    Damn, and it use to be so easy ... LMAO

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYfS72RwcYQ&feature=player_embedded
     
    Last edited:

    Ryedan

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Mar 31, 2012
    12,869
    19,652
    Ontario, Canada
    0.8 to 1.5 is my favorite range. Good clouds, great flavor, doesn't eat my juice up like 0.5 ohm set ups and yeah, I think it's safer since it's about 21W (0.8 ohm) vs 84W (0.2 ohm) lol... Plus I can still use vapesafe2 fuses because it's still under 6A limit on a full battery.

    This is a very good point! Thanks tenshi :thumb:. I'll not forget it.
     

    Ryedan

    ECF Guru
    ECF Veteran
    Verified Member
    Mar 31, 2012
    12,869
    19,652
    Ontario, Canada
    euforeik,

    The other people commented the safety of sub ohm setups (they aren’t safe).

    Correct. But nothing is safe. We have all heard of and seen pictures of eGo batteries that fried, I once had a LT short and stay on until I took the battery out, people have shorted batteries in their pockets, etc. It's all relative. Do you drive or ride in cars? Do you consider that safe? How many people are injured/killed each year in auto accidents? Saying sub-ohm vaping is not safe is like saying life is not safe - after all, no one escapes that endeavor alive.

    I’m trying to comment the purpose of those setups (they’re purposeless).

    Every device in vaping has people who love them and those who hate them. These have a purpose for me. If they are not for you, don't use them.

    My opinion: ultra low resistances are used by the folks which would like to impress the other folks in Internet (or in the pubs).

    I'm not trying to impress anyone. I do it because I love the way my setups vape.

    My advice: if you’d like to impress the folks use your wit; as for the vaping look for the best taste and forget about the huge clouds.

    That's why I use sub-ohm setups. I can tell you don't use them, but if you are going to comment on them it would be better if you at least knew something about their capabilities!

    The useful range of the resistances is from 1.5 to 2.0 Ω with single battery setup.

    So a 2.5 or 3.0 ohm coil in a VV device is not useful in your opinion?

    OK, so you believe all sub-ohm setups are unsafe, purposeless, used by people who mainly want to impress others with them and the only useful resistance is in the range of 1.5 to 2.0 ohms with a single battery.

    :facepalm: Enough said ...
     
    Last edited:
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users who are viewing this thread