All a ya's good!
Talked to ya'll and we're all runnin into the same sh!!t more or less. One thing obvious to me is the Subtank serious is rad diff from previous incarnations of Kanger's and def most clearo's. I wouldn't jump on design problems. Things are there for a reason. D's right on that score. OTH, I
have seen fitment and design variations, i.e. diff slots on the Subtank, not the mini. People are seeing diff results 'cause they are changin' up things like wire, winds on the OCC's. And we'll prolly see more of this. We need insurance. Some basics to feel our way around here.
KISS applies I think. There are vacuum differences which dry out Kanger's OCC
chunky wicks. It's not a flow problem. Restoring vacuum is easy, blow. I love the idea of increasing flow rate. But you gotta be able to build with precision and symmetry to take advantage of it or you flood (and dry hit w/power). Kanger solved the problem by throwin' huge coils and wick at us. But that just diffuses the vape pedal to the metal and blows a lot of juice out the tailpipe. That's not vapor
production. Even with the flow
there is ya need thicker wicks than we've been used to . Again, ya gotta build tighter matching power and airflow to 'em
.more than ever.
So the moral of the story
is
ya gotta rebuild. The tighter the spec, the tighter the wind. Even Kanker focused on symmetry this time out. There is no better measure than building to a baseline single wire tensioned standard. One that'll reliably give you your vape (flavor, texture, volume) every time.
Two good threads goin' right now apart from this one on the SubTMini for one and mountains of info and contributions on the other on how to get power outta the vape with tension. Urge you all to follow both. The crew of vets grows large on
KangerTech SUBTANK Mini
Protank MicroCoil Discussion!!
If you're not subscribed, hit it!
CYA there and g'luck.
