Sorry about your luck. I maintain and program robots every day and I understand how much damage can be done very quickly when these things crash. we try not to use the word crash.
for some reason this scene springs to mind....
Bad week guys, super mega dumb, stupid, sad, depressing, frustrating week.... of poop. ... things started sliding downhill really fast for Ruby, and she's been down and out for 5 or 6 days now ... i was starting to get the feeling something was up by the sounds she was making up to this point and the surface finish in some areas ... she crashes ... this is good sized chunk of damage, and shes was flat dead ... <etc., etc.>
Dan, I measure the wall thickness at 4mm. The o-ring is off set slightly to the outer part of the tank, so no more than 2mm from the outside of the tank. From the positive connection, the carto wick inlet holes clear the tank at 9mm.
Dan if you need any more beta testers, I would be happy to as well.
It looks as if changing the flow rate will also change the OAL, will that affect it fit of the tank in the BB?
It looks as if changing the flow rate will also change the OAL, will that affect it fit of the tank in the BB?
In its current configuration it is 43mm long, a thicker wick will make it protrude slightly, but I would rather have it to long than too shortAll the way screwed together with no wick it is 40mm. Hey, no one gave me a maximum length to stay under
![]()
In its current configuration it is 43mm long, a thicker wick will make it protrude slightly, but I would rather have it to long than too shortAll the way screwed together with no wick it is 40mm. Hey, no one gave me a maximum length to stay under
Dan
It has to fit within the tank compartment and while there is some play in regards to the brass retaining ring the OAl length is going to be very important. The Diver for example is a couple mm's too long despite being sold as a standard carto length. I would think 37mm would be the max OAL.