Some of you may have noticed that more and more localities are either putting moratoriums on new B&M store licenses, and/or revoking licenses of existing ones. Now what happens when interstate sales are banned?
When states start taxing e-liquids, Congress will likely oblige by banning interstate sales. (According to a recent WSJ article, the FDA is already considering this, although I wonde whether they have the authority. Incidently, one of the justifications for requiring F2F transactions is to prevent minors from buying them.)
And of course presumably you're familiar w/ California's proposed legislation. (I could provide links here, but just look at this forum's threads, and also see my daily roundups in the Media area on municipal restrictions applied to B&M stores.)
Oh and BTW MN already has punitive taxes on e-juice - check out the CASAA alerts: Legal status of electronic cigarettes in the USA - Map - ECF InfoZone
Bottom line - some of us are going to have to drive farther and farther to get e-liquids and other supplies, and it will become illegal to take them across state lines. (This is exactly the situation w/ analogs right now, except that most municipalities allow analog sale just about everywhere.)
Not a pretty picture. I don't really think the federal interstate ban is preventable - as more tobacco smokers become vapers, states and the Feds will have to replace that lost tax revenue. That in turn means the restrictions on B&M stores will need to be fought state-by-state and municipality-by-municipality.
The end result of course is that our national policy will be relatively more oriented towards discouraging vaping than tobacco burning.
Ironic, isn't it?
When states start taxing e-liquids, Congress will likely oblige by banning interstate sales. (According to a recent WSJ article, the FDA is already considering this, although I wonde whether they have the authority. Incidently, one of the justifications for requiring F2F transactions is to prevent minors from buying them.)
And of course presumably you're familiar w/ California's proposed legislation. (I could provide links here, but just look at this forum's threads, and also see my daily roundups in the Media area on municipal restrictions applied to B&M stores.)
Oh and BTW MN already has punitive taxes on e-juice - check out the CASAA alerts: Legal status of electronic cigarettes in the USA - Map - ECF InfoZone
Bottom line - some of us are going to have to drive farther and farther to get e-liquids and other supplies, and it will become illegal to take them across state lines. (This is exactly the situation w/ analogs right now, except that most municipalities allow analog sale just about everywhere.)
Not a pretty picture. I don't really think the federal interstate ban is preventable - as more tobacco smokers become vapers, states and the Feds will have to replace that lost tax revenue. That in turn means the restrictions on B&M stores will need to be fought state-by-state and municipality-by-municipality.
The end result of course is that our national policy will be relatively more oriented towards discouraging vaping than tobacco burning.
Ironic, isn't it?