Some insurance companies will test for the presence of nicotine and will treat it like smoking. It boggles my mind that they do this, because anyone who uses the patch or chews the gum will come up positive as well. Until they change this, we're going to get charged up the .... on our policies even though we DON'T SMOKE!
Patches, gum etc. are only supposed to be temporary, and "if used correctly" you are supposed to ween yourself of nicotine.
Yeah, we all know they rarely work as they are supposed to. And the amount of people that actually DO quit using the above methods that re-lapse is very high %-wise.
The same is true for vapors (from the insurance companies standpoint), we "re-lapse". In fact for some of us we never 100% "quit" smoking analogs. Hell, I'm happy to be down to two analogs a day personally.
Most insurance companies will re-test you after a specific period of time if you say you've "quit", usually a year or more.
And reduce your premium if you test clean.
I suppose you could scam the system by figuring out how long nic stays in your system and abstaining for that period of time then return to vaping. But if nicotine shows up in the test after you die... they would probably deny payment.
This is a two edged issue for me. I don't know that I want the FDA involved any more than they are with vaping. BUT if they did some studies and found it "safe"(er) insurance companies would move in a more friendly direction.
But with FDA involvement like that *shudders* taxes and regulations (like the PACT act) would surely follow...
Basically I think we'd get screwed one way or the other.