Vendors & Pkg's & USPS

Status
Not open for further replies.

mwa102464

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Oct 14, 2009
14,447
12,564
Outside of the Philadelphia Burbs, NJ & Fla
Just a little something I would really like to see, there are a lot of people getting there pkg's today that have been opened as well as stolen though the USPS service.( nothing against mailmen & not mentioning any vendors names ) but I think it would be a great idea for all vendors to not use there company name on the return address and maybe use just initials and a return address, as well as can you PLEASE start taping your boxes on every end of the box ! so many times I receive a pkg and it has been obviously opened before I received delivery. I dont know what's going on in the postal system these days but between pkg's not showing up, being ripped off, and opened before delivery please take every opportunity to tape the pkg's up as good as you can these days and it would be a good idea not to broadcast your name of your company on them and maybe just use initials with your return address. I'm just getting a little hot over receiving these pkg's opened as well as not receiving them at all sometimes.

Anybody else with any good ideas for vendors shipments please post your idea, maybe we can all chip in to help out figure whats best so this doesn't happen as much to those of us who have had this happen. Extra Tape & labeling of return address not in company name may help, I know the tape will at a minimum.
 

danwich

Moved On
Nov 3, 2011
39
17
United States
I've had two packages so far that have arrived obviously opened. When I order jewelry, the items are always stealth shipped with no mention of the company name or the product within.

I agree, stealth packaging would be a great thing.

When I ship anything especially priority, I seal the contents of the package in a priority bag (free) then use an envelope or a box. If that interior package is open then there is no question as to tampering.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread