Walmart is in this?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brutus58

Full Member
Jun 27, 2011
34
20
Buckeye Nation
That article is from January of this year. The FDA decided that they will mess with our e-cigs in March or April, so I doubt Walmart will proceed until the govt steps in and ruins everything and the dust settles.

They sell a number of unapproved herbal supplements and other over-hyped health crap, so might have seemed like a good idea before the decision to categorize them as tobacco products.
 

Pamdane

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 10, 2011
2,519
2,399
Cleveland area, Ohio
We can only hope that from a public awareness point of view, this does happen at some point. And those locations that sell them, by default, should let customers vape in the store.

However, I suspect the Wally Corp will pee itself first. They are a bunch of Pansies. The FDA thing is their usual crutch. Never mind that the courts ruled the FDA has NO JURISDICTION. Somewhere, someone, failed to understand that the USA is made up of 3 branches, and that the Judicial branch carries out overseeing the laws that the Executive branch makes. Since FDA was put in its place, they can only puff out and make threats. It seems Wally is too scared. Then again, Wally has grocery sales to protect...
 

Odell

Super Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 25, 2010
998
5,006
Ocala, Florida
www.acbio.com
There may be two things (among others) to consider here. The first concern I have is the perpetuation of the cheap analog looking PV with a poor battery life and a poor performance. Even though you may say that that will increase ecig awareness I am fearful at what cost. Additionally, BT, seeing that there is a growing acceptance of what must be, for them, a terrifying competitive threat, will throw there considerable financial resources into capturing the market. I can envision attys by Emerson Electric, batteries by Duracell, ejuice from Dow Chemical (yikes!). This may improve performance, but (ever being the entrepreneur) could possibly kill off any more innovation of the ecig.

The second concern I have is the possible regulation of the market by government sensing a windfall revenue stream. This may or may not be a heavy downside as the government would then have to call off its attack dogs (FDA, EPA, etc.) and rein in the "experts" (WHO, AMA, etc.). Maybe someone from CAASA (sic) could chime in here and give us a more accurate prognostication on potential outcomes.
 

Iffy

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 3, 2011
9,626
79,411
Florida Suncoast
This may improve performance, but (ever being the entrepreneur) could possibly kill off any more innovation of the ecig.

I don't see that ever happening.

The second concern I have is the possible regulation of the market by government sensing a windfall revenue stream.

That, I do see!
 

Odell

Super Member
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 25, 2010
998
5,006
Ocala, Florida
www.acbio.com
I don't see that ever happening.

Hey Iffy! Perhaps it would have been better stated that I fear innovation in the hands of the money instead of people like the members of the forum pushing the technology. If BT came up with a satisfactory solution to quitting analogs, then I think it would be hard to cost justify innovation in the face of a financial juggernaut such as Altria or Lorillard. Just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread