Washington Post urges FDA to regulate all tobacco products, lower nicoitne, and tax all at same rate.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
In the online version, this was published on February 4, 2013: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...437200-60fa-11e2-a389-ee565c81c565_story.html

In the print edition, published today (2/5/13) the title was "Holding our Breath". It is available online, but you must be a subscriber to view it.


[h=3]The Post’s View[/h]
[h=1]FDA should do more with its authority over tobacco products[/h]
IN 2009, PRESIDENT Obama signed the tobacco Control Act, which gave the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority over tobacco products. It was a signal moment in the fight against smoking. Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in the country, racking up 400,000 premature deaths in America every year and holding 40 million Americans in the grip of addiction. After decades of education campaigns, cessation programs and increasing taxes, the U.S. smoking rate is stuck at about a fifth of the adult population. And after a string of headline-worthy achievements, the FDA’s tobacco program has been a little quiet lately.

<snip>

So far, the agency has asserted authority over only cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, not products such as cigars, pipe tobacco or e-cigarettes. Until it claims broader jurisdiction, it can’t compel the examination of ingredients and assess their relative lethality, let alone regulate more aggressively. Flavored cigarettes have been banned, but tobacco companies still flavor cigars to taste like grape or cola, and the vaporous chemical mixture inhaled from e-cigarettes now comes in flavors such as “cherry limeade” and “Atomic Fireball.” The lung association sees upticks in the use of non-cigarette tobacco products and worries that the industry will hook children with new, less-regulated products. Menthol cigarettes, meanwhile, are still on sale.

<snip>

Lawrence Deyton, the FDA’s chief tobacco regulator, says the agency has been busy enforcing all the rules it enacted in its first years, building a regulatory body from scratch and informing tobacco companies what it will expect of them. In order to take steps such as dialing back the amount of nicotine in tobacco products, the agency must undertake exhaustive scientific research demonstrating that its decisions are not “arbitrary and capricious.” Mr. Deyton says the public can expect more progress in 2013.

Meanwhile, the FDA isn’t the only body that needs to act. Congress should raise national tobacco taxes, especially for products that currently enjoy preferential tax treatment relative to cigarettes, such as large cigars and pipe tobacco. States, too, can raise excises and devote more of the money to anti-tobacco programs. These sorts of policies have saved many lives over decades of effort, and there’s reason to think that old tools can still help.

Near as I can tell, the only difference between the two versions is the headline.

But as far as raising taxes reducing tobacco use, the latest research shows that may not be as effective as it once was.
Study Shows that Genetics Play an Important Role in Anti-Tobacco Policies | SciTech Daily
 

tommy2bad

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 1, 2011
461
506
Kilkenny
Yes at this stage smokers are immune to the campaigns to get them to quit. And whats worse is that the most likely thing to work will fall into the same 'ignore list' if it's regulated as a medical device or regulated so much it becomes infective.
The point where diminishing returns kicks in has been reached in smoking control. They would be better off leting ecigs take hold before endorsing or condemning them to the pharmacies shelves.
 

Big Screen D

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 5, 2011
2,292
2,830
Georgia
These two sentences read as an attorney full employment protection act. Here's to hoping E-Cig makers can tie em up in court for years.

In order to take steps such as dialing back the amount of nicotine in tobacco products, the agency must undertake exhaustive scientific research demonstrating that its decisions are not “arbitrary and capricious.” Mr. Deyton says the public can expect more progress in 2013.
 

Trick

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 14, 2012
1,655
2,846
Round Rock, Texas, United States
So, increase taxes and dial back the level of nicotine in cigarettes so that smokers end up smoking more(therefore buying more) to get their nicotine fix. What a way to generate revenue.:blink:

Not to mention dying faster. It ain't the nicotine that kills you.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Since the Washington Post did not see fit to publish my Letter to the Editor commenting on their editorial, I'll publish it here:

The February 5 editorial, “Holding our breath” urges the FDA to assert authority over cigars, pipe tobacco, and e-cigarettes under the Tobacco Control Act, and to impose the same restrictions regarding nicotine levels, flavors, and taxation as on tobacco cigarettes. As they relate to e-cigarettes, these measures would only perpetuate smoking and encourage a thriving black market.

The CDC estimates that cigarette smoking causes 443,000 deaths annually (including deaths from secondhand smoke). A cigarette smoker who switches to a smokeless tobacco product or an e-cigarette reduces his or her health risks to nearly the same level as a non-tobacco user.

The Institute of Medicine and the UK’s Royal College of Physicians have stated that some smokers will never be able to give up all use of nicotine. Encouraging smokers to switch to a smoke-free alternative could save millions of lives. Lowering the nicotine levels and banning flavors in these products would make them less acceptable as a replacement for smoking.

The Post also recommends that Congress raise taxes on tobacco products that are currently taxed at an amount less than cigarettes. Tobacco product taxes should reflect the relative level of health risks imposed by each product.
 

jazon1

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 16, 2012
1,662
1,075
Phoenix,AZ
personally i have never viewed taxing peoples addictions as a way to make them quit or cut down on use,i have always seen it as the government taking advantage of people who suffer from addictions to make a profit like any other criminal.if they had really wanted to help people quit smoking they would have just made it illegal years ago like many other things they had,because they had decided they were not profitable to them.
 
Last edited:

Lilkurty

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 26, 2013
281
197
Canada
Thanks, I'm going to take this to my (Canadian) doctor today. I had an appointment already scheduled but since I have been smoke free for 1 month and 8 days now I am going to let him know that I will be forced to go back to smoking since Health Canada is denying my right to access a healthier and effective harm reduction method that is obviously working for me

I am also going to detail my experience so far and let him no that if only e cigarettes are made available that will not be effective for me as e cigs were not enough. While they were the starting point, without access to e liquids and the ability to vape they also would not be enough for me. The ability to vape frequently and to start to taper off on nicotine seems to be very effective amongst the vaping community.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
If all smokers went "Cold Turkey" ...
Governments would repeal all smoking bans
to regain the lost tax revenues.

As well as to restore the lost sanity. Why do you think so many ship captains are quietly looking the other way when U.S. sailors use a smoke-free alternative.
 

TennDave

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 19, 2010
9,988
8,034
65
Knoxville, TN
Thanks, I'm going to take this to my (Canadian) doctor today. I had an appointment already scheduled but since I have been smoke free for 1 month and 8 days now I am going to let him know that I will be forced to go back to smoking since Health Canada is denying my right to access a healthier and effective harm reduction method that is obviously working for me

I am also going to detail my experience so far and let him no that if only e cigarettes are made available that will not be effective for me as e cigs were not enough. While they were the starting point, without access to e liquids and the ability to vape they also would not be enough for me. The ability to vape frequently and to start to taper off on nicotine seems to be very effective amongst the vaping community.
Can you tell us what your doctor said?
 

Dacholiday Dach

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I was a smoker for 40 years. I can not even remember not smoking. But I have now not had a regular cigarette in 22 days. And for someone like myself that is a real accomplishment. I basically started vaping to save money, because I enjoyed smoking. And had no desire to quit. Now I don't miss it and have 0 urge to smoke a real cigarette.
I so hope they don't go screwing with e-cigs, because I really don't want to go back to the old ones.
 

Lilkurty

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 26, 2013
281
197
Canada
Can you tell us what your doctor said?

Well, for starters my blood pressure is down from about mid 130s I think to 118/76. My Doc is happy and on board. I explained the situation and he is willing to write a prescription for me so that I can obtain in the US and bring back a supply with me. I am going back to FL late March so we'll see how it goes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread