I think the first yt vid I watched right through regarding vaping was a "how to" vid regarding coils and wicking. I think it was a Russian guy, I didnt understand a word but the visual was fine.
I respond better to written reviews. Generally the yt reviewer gets off track and for too long. Often they inject too much of their own opinion and bias, and sometimes too much of their personality.
With a written review the writer needs to stay on target, be succinct but cover every important aspect of a device.
One hilarious thing I have picked up on with yt vid reviewers is where they finish coiling and wicking and then say, "right, lets go back up top and vape this". Some times they just stay where they are. There is no up top. Ive even read a review where the writer says, "so, back up on top, how does it vape"
Its like the reviewers in their naivety heard it so many times they thought it was a cool, hip and trendy catch phrase rather than a way to explain a change in location.
Anyway, back up on top, so what are my thoughts on yt vape reviews?
All the reviewers are related, they have the same last name, Vapes. Thats a pro and a con.
I like Mike Vapes and SMM designed RTA's and RDA's, Im going to give that a pro
Each reviewer tends to wick every RTA the same way they wick every previous rta they have reviewed. I dont know if thats a pro or con, I think its subjective, you will have to make up your own mind about that one.
So there you have it, the youtube vape reviewer review with Jebbn Vapes