If employers want to test whether their employees are smoking, the most accurate test is exhaled carbon monoxide. Robert Pooner is absolutely correct. Tests for nicotine in the system don't reveal how the nicotine got into the system. Many people got hooked on smoking because it enabled them to pay attention, concentrate, and remember things, and/or because it reduced agression, depression, and anxiety. Switching to a smoke-free alterantive allows such people to reduce their risks of smoking-related disease by up to 99% while retaining their cognitive abilities and emotional health.
In reviewing the evidence presented by over 20 years of research on Swedish smokers who switched to low-nitrosamine snus, Dr. Neil Benowitz found there is no evidence that nicotine causes or promotes cancer and does not appear to increase the risks of heart attacks or stokes. The employees who rely on nicotine's beneficial effects can force themselves to stop using nicotine, but then they will not be able to perform their jobs because they can't focus their attention on the task at hand and make numerous mistakes, regardless of their best efforts to be vigilent. It is also difficult to be a model employee when you are struggling with emotions that you can't control such as feeling angry, sad, or nervous all the time. It is not in the best interests of either the employee or the employer for the employer to insist on nicotine abstinence instead of being satisfied with smoking abstinence. Everybody loses with policies like these.
Nicotine Testing - More Speciousness
The idea of equating a nicotine test with smoking is nonsense on stilts.
These tests actually look for the presence of cotinine, a nicotine metabolite. But, as others have said, nicotine can also enter the system by NRT patches, gum, tobacco dissolvables, e-cigarettes, even nicotine-rich foods such as tomatoes and eggplant.
Which leads to the logical conclusion - the presence of cotinine in the body does not necessarily mean that the nicotine came from inhalation of burning tobacco.
Left comment:
The nicotine prohibitionists do not WANT to believe that trying to go without nicotine makes some folks dysfunctional. They want to believe that "withdrawal" symptoms are time-limited and mild for everyone. They call people using nicotine for therapeutic purposes "addicts." This places the blame on the person who becomes dysfunctional without nicotine and relieves the prohibtionist of any responsibilty for negative outcomes. If you deny that the victim is a victim, you can't be accused of blaming the victim.
Comment left
I want to take away their coffee!
My wife works at a hospital and there insurance will pay for the e-cig starter kits if an employee or family member of an employee chooses to switch to them. I got one of my first kits free.
Left comment:
The nicotine prohibitionists do not WANT to believe that trying to go without nicotine makes some folks dysfunctional. They want to believe that "withdrawal" symptoms are time-limited and mild for everyone. They call people using nicotine for therapeutic purposes "addicts." This places the blame on the person who becomes dysfunctional without nicotine and relieves the prohibtionist of any responsibilty for negative outcomes. If you deny that the victim is a victim, you can't be accused of blaming the victim.
That is both awesome and amazing! We can only hope that more in the medical profession (including those in the corporate half) will follow them.
We should tell the prohibitionists that we'll stop all nicotine which is a legal drug... once they win that whole war on illegal drugs first. HAHA !