Since none of those acronyms show up on this forum with the dotted line underneat and the explanation when you hover over it, I'd say it feels like the jury's still open on those acronyms!
I beg to differ sir.
The use of rda to refer to a dripping atomizer distinguishes it from all other rebuildables, and establishes rba's as other than rda's, and more specifically as genesis atomizers. An RDA is a dripper and you full well know it.
That said, I take exception to those who take liberties with acronyms in order to pepper those new to rebuildables with pro-dripper propaganda in those threads in which they (the new vapers) state an interest in RBA's. It has long annoyed me that the dripping fanatics do this, and you may expect me to oppose this practice in the future.
In my own experience dripping atomizers are in no way superior to genesis atomizers, and in fact leave a good deal to be desired.
Last edited: