Whats the deal with Marlboro "Gold Pack" analogs?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I noticed in my quest to get off analogs that my old favorite, Marlboro Light isn't called "Light" anymore. Now it is called "Gold Pack".

Now, let me preface my next thoughts by stating that I *did* read the forum rules and this is NOT an attempt at sparking a political debate, there are plenty of forums to debate left -vs- right. That's not what my question is about.

Here goes. I've asked around and have heard conflicting stories on why Lights are now called "Gold". The most often response I am getting is that this was Obama's idea or at the very least, Government doing. Doesn't seem like a move the tobacco companies would make on their own.

Anybody have any insight?

Keep in mind, I am not looking for Obama bashing OR worshiping, I just want to know if anyone knows if this rumor is true or not, or basically who was behind the "Lights are now Golds" idea.

Anyone?
 

JC Okie

REOnaut
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 2, 2010
6,511
17,814
Tulsa, OK
I read somewhere that they could no longer refer to some as "light".....because that didn't say much, in the first place, and that it was misleading, at best. So the changed to the colors. Probably some regulation they're having to comply with....makes sense. Probably has nothing to do with Obama....other than possibly some agency told them they couldn't call cigarettes "light" when it implied something that wasn't true. I can't find where I read that....you could google it. Probably come up with something.....hmmmmm. BTW, welcome fellow Okie. I'm in Tulsa. Been vaping for a little over 3 months....successfully! Absolutely loving it.
 

Rosa

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Mar 18, 2010
4,947
210
Beaverton, Oregon!
Yeah, they changed the rules around packaging or something. I think they did a study and found that "light" smokers will either smoke more or hold the cigarette in such a way that it wasn't actually "light" anymore (like putting their fingers around the little holes they put in the filter and smoking two at a time or something).

Basically, they decided the word "light" made smokers think they aren't going to die if they choose the "light" smokes, when we all know that's not true and "light" isn't healthy for you any more that the regular ones are.

FWIW: if someone gave me a "light" cig I always ripped the filter off and smoked it as a straight.
 

jmaul99

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 19, 2010
361
2
Marietta, GA
Actually it was the FDA's idea. Someone or group at the FDA felt the term light or extra light implied a cigarette was safer. Just shows how dumb government bureaucrats think we are. I've never met a smoker or former smoker that felt light or extra light meant a cigarette was safer. The terms were only referring to the flavor. Its just a way for the government to say there helping to reduce smoking deaths and underage smoking. Interestingly enough the percentage of smokers actually increased in 2009 for the first time in over 40 years. Some of this was probably due to the economy more so than the new regulations. Just an interesting statistic.
 

Travis798

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Nov 7, 2009
378
29
45
Oklahoma
What? Omg, you guys are actually going to try to tell me that my lights weren't safer than full flavor? They are called LIGHTS people. They were light on tar. They were safer. So somebody tells you guys that they are just as dangerous as full flavor and you buy into it.. Geeze, some people will believe anything.



Okay, I'm kidding. Seriously, I know the lights were bad for you... thats why I switched to pall mall blues... blues can't be bad for you... I mean, blue is a pretty color! right?
 

harmony

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 11, 2010
230
0
Maryland
...or maybe they did.... I have this paranoid delusion that every time they change the packaging they add something to make them more addictive too. Is it just me?

No I dont think it is just you. I swore they tasted stale. I even exchanged a carton. I was so peeved when they changed. It was such a ritual that I counted on them looking the same. I called the newport company and asked them if they changed all of the packaging. It made me insane.
 

myrc60

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 4, 2010
138
3
Greenville, SC, USA
No I dont think it is just you. I swore they tasted stale. I even exchanged a carton. I was so peeved when they changed. It was such a ritual that I counted on them looking the same. I called the newport company and asked them if they changed all of the packaging. It made me insane.

Are you certain the change in taste wasn't because of FSC? FSC changed the smell of the smoke and the taste of them as well.
 

Bozzlite

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2010
1,889
777
Central Texas
Yep, thats it. The FDA thought smokers would think that a cig labeled "light" or "ultra light" would give make them think it was a safer cigarette. They went on to say that "light" smokers actually inhaled harder and deeper to make up for the less nicotine and tar. While that may be true for a few smokers, I don't think that was the case for me. I smoked Basic Lights at the end, but years ago I smoked full "flavor" Marlboro 100's.

The tobacco companys have adapted by changing the color of the packages. Apparently, the darker the package, the stronger the cig. So lights have evolved to "Gold" packs and ultra lights have white packages.

To me this seems like its making the problem worse, because a newbie smoker won't know the difference between a high tar and nic cig and a low tar and nic cig. Of course, to the FDA, they are the same.

That is also why you never saw the nic and tar content listed on a pack of cigs. Against FDA regs. They assumed that a smoker would go for the heavy load for more total smoking satisfaction. Or go for the lower tar and nic for a safer cig. Is there something contradictory here?

You can't find the alcohol content on a can of beer....against FDA regs. But on a bottle of whiskey, vodka, or tequila, alcohol content is required by law. Here we go again.

Cigarettes have been proven to be unsafe but you can still buy them. E-cigs have not been proven to be safe so they might want to ban or regulate them.
Doh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread