Who wants massive vapor, and fabulous taste???
- Thread starter SMILIN
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
Who wants massive vapor, and fabulous taste???
I do.
I'm definitely interested, but today necessarily I don't want today's
V4Ls no longer available. Just last night and today I had been wondering about something.
Last night while driving, I thought the vapor had diminished, but really I just couldn't see very much of it. Today just hours ago, it was hot and humid, and I noticed I wasn't seeing much vapor outdoors. If I'm in the car, or indoors, the vapor was great, but outdoors it looked a little diminished.
I do.
I'm definitely interested, but today necessarily I don't want today's
V4Ls no longer available. Just last night and today I had been wondering about something.
Last night while driving, I thought the vapor had diminished, but really I just couldn't see very much of it. Today just hours ago, it was hot and humid, and I noticed I wasn't seeing much vapor outdoors. If I'm in the car, or indoors, the vapor was great, but outdoors it looked a little diminished.
Yep. Worth repeating one more time.
Thanks! I thought that got lost in the "me-too-noise".
Like not being able to form fog in poor atmospheric conditions?
Or like you can't see vapor against a light background with bright front-lighting?
Thanks! I thought that got lost in the "me-too-noise".
No not lost, Addy. It's a real concern of mine too. The inconsistency in the batts has largely been a manufacturing problem in that they didn't do the holes like we wanted them to last time, and I think we've got that licked this batch. The flavor inconsistency is an ongoing battle, but I think we're finding solutions to that, too.
Manufacturing variances are the final battle ground, and for that we may just have to start our own manufacturers, and thus have more control over acceptable tolerances. But we will do what it takes, whatever that is.
That's good to hear, Leaf', thanks!
From my limited perspective - that's a tougher problem and a more critical problem. Delivering more vapor today is nice (for some, I suppose [shrug]), but if you can't do it again tomorrow - why? You just disappointed everyone that wanted it and blew the opportunity. Delivering more flavor is great - if it's a flavor people like and is the _same flavor_ every time.
Anyway - putting too fine a point on the subject, I'm sure. But that's my take on it.
From my limited perspective - that's a tougher problem and a more critical problem. Delivering more vapor today is nice (for some, I suppose [shrug]), but if you can't do it again tomorrow - why? You just disappointed everyone that wanted it and blew the opportunity. Delivering more flavor is great - if it's a flavor people like and is the _same flavor_ every time.
Anyway - putting too fine a point on the subject, I'm sure. But that's my take on it.
Hi leaford, in a sense, yes, that's why I want the upcoming massive vapor and fabulous taste trick.Adrenalynn, yes, it was an optical illusion, since in reality I was still vaping. It's just that it surprised me initially, and couldn't understand it since I had just filled a blank, and refilled the other.
So... that's why I found the massive vapor and fabulous taste trick thread totally amazing.
Driving, I wondered if there was a phosphorescent flavor, but no; and outdoors today I realized it would probably require harmful smoke, so I gave up on it. But tonight I found this thread, and that definitely was all I could possibly want, the trick in your sleeves
!! So I'm definitely in it, I just didn't want it to replace the current line, maybe just expanded? I'm so glad, V4L is so wonderful!
How soon will we know what it is ?
I'll weigh in as one of those who don't need or necessarily want massive vapor, just not key to the experience to me for some reason. And ability to stealth 'efficiently' when necessary or desired is more important to me also, as someone who expects to never get over the thrill of being able to 'smoke' (but not!) in many places again.
The quality of flavor and vape seem to me to have more to do with the particular batt I've grabbed than with the carto, tho premiums have been better in general. I don't care about massive clouds of vapor. Middle path. Taste matters most. I'm always OK with V4L products - if an occasional carto seems thin or flat, i put it on the passthru. 5 volts would be too hot, imho, so not aching for a mod. But curious - more vape usually means more VG. That'd be OK, I swing both ways. It's all so much better than cigarettes, and I'm preoccupied w/upcoming legislation.
I'm in. I'm like Leaford, I LOVE massive vapor - probably all in my head but I like seeing vapor on the exhale .. of course, taste is important too.
I'm agreeing with Aubergine - not so much about the vapor.....but the taste, consistent taste. I think the battery definitely affects everything - I can move one carto to a different battery and get a different taste.
If its a mod im in just as long as the price is right... living on a limited budget makes it hard to get a mod especially at some of the prices... If the price is right it will be my first mod
- Status
Similar threads
